Full Text
Translation output
ix $-39 to 43 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C)11615/2016,CM APPL.45814-15/2016
TIRUPATI BALAJIFIBRES LIMITED Petitioner
Through:Mr.Salil Aggarwal,Mr.Prakash Kr.
And Mr.Ankit Gupta,Advs.
W.P.(C)11615/2016,CM APPL.45814-15/2016
TIRUPATI BALAJIFIBRES LIMITED Petitioner
Through:Mr.Salil Aggarwal,Mr.Prakash Kr.
And Mr.Ankit Gupta,Advs.
VERSUS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX,CENTRAL.CIRCLE-28,NEW DELHI Respondent
Through: Mr.Zoheb Hossain,Sr. St. Counsel and Mr.Deepak Anand,Jr. St. Counsel.
Through: Mr.Zoheb Hossain,Sr. St. Counsel and Mr.Deepak Anand,Jr. St. Counsel.
W.P.(C)11616/2016,CM APPL.45816-17/2016
TIRUPATI BALAJI FIBRES LIMITED Petitioner
Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Prakash ,Kr.
TIRUPATI BALAJI FIBRES LIMITED Petitioner
Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Prakash ,Kr.
VERSUS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX,CENTRAL j CIRCLE-28,NEW DELHI Respondent
W.P.(C)11617/2016,CM APPL.45818-19/2016
Through: Mr.Salil Aggarwal,Mr.Prakash Kr.
Through: Mr.Salil Aggarwal,Mr.Prakash Kr.
VERSUS
CIRCLE-28,NEW DELHI Respondent and Mr.Deepak Anand,Jr.-St. Counsel.
W.P.(C)11618/2016,CM APPL.45820-21/2016
Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Prakash Kr.
And Mr.Ankit Giipta,Advs.
Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Prakash Kr.
And Mr.Ankit Giipta,Advs.
VERSUS
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF E4C0ME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-28,NEW DELHI .....Respondent
2017:DHC:8372-DB
2017:DHC:8372-DB
W.P.(C)11619/2016,CM APPL.45822-23/2016
TIRUPATI BALAJIFIBRUES LIMITED Petitioner
Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Prakash Kr.
And Ml'. Ankit Gupta,Advs.
TIRUPATI BALAJIFIBRUES LIMITED Petitioner
Through: Mr. Salil Aggarwal, Mr. Prakash Kr.
And Ml'. Ankit Gupta,Advs.
VERSUS
CIRCLE-28,NEW DELHI Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
18.01.2017 After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the writ petitions.
The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
S.RAVIND^BHAT,J JANUARY 18,2017/acm NAJMI WAZIRI,J
2017:DHC:8372-DB
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
18.01.2017 After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner wishes to withdraw the writ petitions.
The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
S.RAVIND^BHAT,J JANUARY 18,2017/acm NAJMI WAZIRI,J
2017:DHC:8372-DB
JUDGMENT