Full Text
Translation output
'/ $-29 to 35 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 879/2016
SMT. USHA CHAUPIASIA Petitioner
W.P.(C) 879/2016
SMT. USHA CHAUPIASIA Petitioner
W.P.(C) 882/2016
ARPIT CHAURASIA Petitioner
ARPIT CHAURASIA Petitioner
W.P.(C) 883/2016
KAMALA KANT CHAURASIA Petitioner
KAMALA KANT CHAURASIA Petitioner
W.P.(C) 885/2016
KAMAL KISHORE CHAURASIA ' ..... Petitioner
KAMAL KISHORE CHAURASIA ' ..... Petitioner
W.P.(CI 1008/2016
NAVNfi'ET CHAURASIA Petitioner
NAVNfi'ET CHAURASIA Petitioner
W.P.(CY 1009/2016
ANAND KUMAR CHAURASIA Petitioner
ANAND KUMAR CHAURASIA Petitioner
W.P.(C) 1010/2016
KAMLA KANT AND COMPANY Petitioner
KAMLA KANT AND COMPANY Petitioner
VERSUS
ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ..... Respondents
~ , Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi and Mr.Arta Trana
Panda, Advocates for the Petitioners.
Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda and Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Advocates for the Respondents.
~ , Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi and Mr.Arta Trana
Panda, Advocates for the Petitioners.
Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda and Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Advocates for the Respondents.
CORAM:
HON'I^LE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
07.02.2017 In these cases, the claim is for refund of excess amounts paid toithe satisfaction ofthe Income Tax dues. Counsel for the petitioners states that in
W.P.(C) No.882/2016 and W.P.(C) No. 1009/2016, which are listed as Item
Nos. 30 and 34 respectively, amounts together with interest have been refunded in full. It is stated that in the other writ petitions though amounts have been refunded but interest has not been fully granted.
2017:DHC:8871-DB 'h' In view of the submissions made, W.P.(C) Nos.882/2016 and
1009/2016 are disposed offas infructuous since the claim has been satisfied.
As regards the other proceedings, it is open to the petitioners to represent afresh to the respondents with respect to any surviving grievance, in regard to the non-payment of part of the interest. The concerned
Assessment Officer shall consider and pass a speaking order on such representations/claims within six weeks ofreceipt thereof.
W,.P.(C) Nos.879/2016, 883/2016, 885/2016, 1008/2016 and
,1010/2016 are accordingly disposed off in the aboveterms.
Lj^4 S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
FEBRUARY 07, 2017 sb ' NAJMIWAZIRI, J.
L
2017:DHC:8871-DB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
07.02.2017 In these cases, the claim is for refund of excess amounts paid toithe satisfaction ofthe Income Tax dues. Counsel for the petitioners states that in
W.P.(C) No.882/2016 and W.P.(C) No. 1009/2016, which are listed as Item
Nos. 30 and 34 respectively, amounts together with interest have been refunded in full. It is stated that in the other writ petitions though amounts have been refunded but interest has not been fully granted.
2017:DHC:8871-DB 'h' In view of the submissions made, W.P.(C) Nos.882/2016 and
1009/2016 are disposed offas infructuous since the claim has been satisfied.
As regards the other proceedings, it is open to the petitioners to represent afresh to the respondents with respect to any surviving grievance, in regard to the non-payment of part of the interest. The concerned
Assessment Officer shall consider and pass a speaking order on such representations/claims within six weeks ofreceipt thereof.
W,.P.(C) Nos.879/2016, 883/2016, 885/2016, 1008/2016 and
,1010/2016 are accordingly disposed off in the aboveterms.
Lj^4 S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.
FEBRUARY 07, 2017 sb ' NAJMIWAZIRI, J.
L
2017:DHC:8871-DB
JUDGMENT