Ashishkumar v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

1. ■ The petitioners seek anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.465/2016 registered under Sections 328/406/498A/34 IPG at PS UttamNagar. Status report is onrecord. 2., I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By an order dated 13.06.2016, the petitioners were" granted interim protection and were directed to join the. investigation as and whenrequired. Undisputedly, the petitioners have joined the BAIL APPLN. 1266/2016 & connectedmatter page1of[2] 2017:DHC:8429 •/ n investigatioii,4ncethen'.,,.,■ •, ■ ■ 3,'.. By ah order dated 18^.07.2016, with,the ebrisent pf the parties; the matter was.referred tdDelhiHigh'Cpurt Mediation & Cohciliatidn ■ 4'.;;', GoncilisLtioh Centre that the matter has bden settled between the. paities:vide settlement agreement dated 06v01.2017. None, has, ' 'appeared, on behalf'v:6f the complainant to hepprt seltlemdnt.- Petitioners',, counsel inforrned. that the ihatter has been' sjettled, amicably: before the Delhi High Court l!^diation.& Conciliatipn^ ^, Centre and first,payrrient pursuant, to the settlement agre.emeiit has ' already beenmade to the complaiharit. -

5. Considermg the,"facts,and' circumstances of.the case;,,,fhe petitioners are,granted anticipatpry bail,andinthe event of arrest,they: be released on furnishingpersonalbondinthe^sum of? 40,000/- with,',dne /Surety each in the -like. amp,unt tb^; the satisfaction' of the SHO/Inyestigating officef/ T[1] as and.whenrequired.

6. The baU applications stand, disposed of.' /;, 1., V ■ y:GARG, J. FEBRUARY 03, 2017 / tr BAILAPPLN. 1266/2016, & connectedmatter page 2 of[2] ' r N-