CHFaSHSOLANKI v. Union of India and Anr

Delhi High Court · 06 Feb 2017 · 2017:DHC:8876-DB
Indira Banerjee; Y. Kameswar Rao
W.P.(C) Nos. 1026/2017 and 1037/2017
2017:DHC:8876-DB
constitutional petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed two writ petitions due to procedural defects, notably the absence of a prayer to set aside the impugned order, granting liberty to file fresh petitions.

Full Text
Translation output
if
•- I • . '
>;\$~37^d39- ' HIGH COURT OF DELHI
' . , , •Through: . Ms. SeemaShamia, Advocate: - J
^ -.versus ; • 7 , • ' , " , •' , ' • /• / ; '
' UNION OF INDIA AND ANR , ' ..... Respondents
/ ; ^ / ' . ' Through Mr.RajeshKumar, Advocate. .-
; ^ //' •,,'•39 • ;• .v„
" • ^W.P.(C) 1037/2017, ^ ' , ' • ^ CHFaSHSOLANKI , , ' , • ; ' .....Pptition^ .
,, . . ^ Through Ms; Seenia Shanna, Advocate.-
.. versus'V . ' ' ' \' ^ r ' UNION OF INDIA AND ANR : ' ' ..... Respondents
: , ) , J Through ^ Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate. . !
'-'GORAM: /
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Y.KAMESWAR RAO
\ • y
; ORDER ' ' •
\ 06.02.2017 CMNo. 469i5/2017 (ExiemptiohVin W.P.fC^ 1026/2017
CM No. 4735/2017 (Exemption^ in W.P.(CV1Q37/Idl7
; . The appiications stand disposed of. . , .
W:P.(C) Nos. 1026/2017mdI037/20I7 ^ •' ' ' ' . / page 1of2
1'^ .
2017:DHC:8876-DB n W.P.(a Nos. 1026/2017 and 1037/2017
There are defects in these writ petitions and due to inadvertence, there isno prayer for setting aside theorder ofpunishment impugned.
' In view of the defects and on the prayer of Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with
Hbertyto file fresh writ petitions." FEBRUARY 06,2017 rs
INDIRA BANERJEE,J V.KAMESWAR RAO, J W.P.(C) Nos. 1026/2017 and1037/2017 ' , ' page2 of2
2017:DHC:8876-DB
JUDGMENT