Full Text
Translation output
y .
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ITA 31/2017 & CM No.1697/2017
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ITA 31/2017 & CM No.1697/2017
ITA 32/2017 & CM Nos.1698-99/2017
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-IV ..... Appellant , Thrdugh: Mx. Dileep Shivpuri, Mr. Sanjay Kumar andMr. Vto^nt A.
Maheshwari, Advocates.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX-IV ..... Appellant , Thrdugh: Mx. Dileep Shivpuri, Mr. Sanjay Kumar andMr. Vto^nt A.
Maheshwari, Advocates.
VERSUS
M/S DAURALA FOODS & BEVERAGES P. LTD...... Respondent
Through: None.
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SrRAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
13.02.2017 CM No.1698/2017 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed off.
ITA Nos. 31/2017 & CM No.1697/2017 & ITA 32/2017 & CM
Nos.1699/2017 At the outset, the Court notices that both appeals are grossly time barred by-890,days; which is the time taken by the Revenue to re-file the appeals. In both instances, the explanation for the delay is less then convincing; the Revenue states the heavy workload of appellant, which it unable to effectively manage as well as the lack of manpower. The other reason stated is the reorganization of its paiiel counsels. Both did not
2017:DHC:9035-DB constitute sufficient cause" to enable the Court to condone the delay.
The applications and appeals are accordingly dismissed. .
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, X \ . y ' FEBRUARY 13,2017 sb
NA^I WAZIRI, J.
2017:DHC:9035-DB
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
13.02.2017 CM No.1698/2017 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed off.
ITA Nos. 31/2017 & CM No.1697/2017 & ITA 32/2017 & CM
Nos.1699/2017 At the outset, the Court notices that both appeals are grossly time barred by-890,days; which is the time taken by the Revenue to re-file the appeals. In both instances, the explanation for the delay is less then convincing; the Revenue states the heavy workload of appellant, which it unable to effectively manage as well as the lack of manpower. The other reason stated is the reorganization of its paiiel counsels. Both did not
2017:DHC:9035-DB constitute sufficient cause" to enable the Court to condone the delay.
The applications and appeals are accordingly dismissed. .
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, X \ . y ' FEBRUARY 13,2017 sb
NA^I WAZIRI, J.
2017:DHC:9035-DB
JUDGMENT