Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BAIL APPLN. 1926/2016
SUKHBIR Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate.
BAIL APPLN. 1926/2016
SUKHBIR Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate.
VERSUS
STATE (GOVT. OFNCT OFDELHI Represented by:
BAIL APPLN. 1969/2016
SUNltA Representedby:
SUNltA Representedby:
VERSUS
STATE
Representedby:
Representedby:
BAIL APPLN. 1885/2016
SACHINVERMA
Represented by:
SACHINVERMA
Represented by:
VERSUS
) Respondent Ms. Rajni Gupta, APPwith SI Somveer Singh.
Mr. S. Khan, Advocate for the complainant.
Petitioner Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate.
Respondent Mr. Ravi Nayak,APPwith SI Petitioner
Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate.
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NOT OF DELHI) Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with
SI Somveer Singh.
Mr. S. Khan, Advocate for the complainant.
Petitioner Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate.
Respondent Mr. Ravi Nayak,APPwith SI Petitioner
Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate.
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NOT OF DELHI) Respondent Represented by: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP with
SI Somveer Singh.
BAILAPPLN. 1926/2016,1969/2016,1885/2016 &1925/2016 Page 1 of2
2017:DHC:8433
2017:DHC:8433
BAIL APPLN. 1925/2016
RAJKUMAR Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate.
RAJKUMAR Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sumit Choudhary, Advocate.
VERSUS
o STATE (GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI) Respondent
Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, AFP with SI
Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, AFP with SI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
0/„ 06.02.2017
Repeatedly adjournments have been sought by the petitioner on the pretext that the payment would be made which is the sole basis for grant of interim protection to the petitioner, however the petitioner despite having availed the benefit ofinterim protection has not made payments.
Interim order infavour ofthe petitioner are vacated.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petitions.
Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
FEBRUARY 06,2017 'ga'
0/„ 06.02.2017
Repeatedly adjournments have been sought by the petitioner on the pretext that the payment would be made which is the sole basis for grant of interim protection to the petitioner, however the petitioner despite having availed the benefit ofinterim protection has not made payments.
Interim order infavour ofthe petitioner are vacated.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petitions.
Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
FEBRUARY 06,2017 'ga'
BAILAPPLN. 1926/2016,1969/2016,1885/2016&1925/2016 Page 2of2
2017:DHC:8433
2017:DHC:8433
JUDGMENT