Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL)143/2016&Crl.M.A.837/2016
MOHD.YAMIN Petitioner Represented by: None,
W.P.(CRL)143/2016&Crl.M.A.837/2016
MOHD.YAMIN Petitioner Represented by: None,
VERSUS
STATE &ANR Represented by: Ms.Kamna Vohra,ASC.
W.P.(CRL)145/2016&Crl.M.A.845/2016
Represented by: None.
„ aja Petitioner
SALMA
Represented by: None.
„ aja Petitioner
SALMA
VERSUS
STATES ANR , ^ v Represented by: Ms.Kamna Vohra,AoC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
14.02.2017 Even on pass over,none appears for the petitioner. Steps have no beentakenforservice ofrespondentNo.2. Even onthe lastdateofhearing i.e. on 28"^ September, 2016 learned proxy counsel prayed for an adjournmentas arguing counsel was notavailable. Fresh notice could not be issued as process fee was returned under objection. Prior thereto also stepswerenottakenforserviceofrespondentNo.2.
Petitionsand applications are dismissedfornon-prosecution.
MUKTA GUPTA,J.
FEBRUARY 14,2017 'v mittal' 2017:DHC:8624
14.02.2017 Even on pass over,none appears for the petitioner. Steps have no beentakenforservice ofrespondentNo.2. Even onthe lastdateofhearing i.e. on 28"^ September, 2016 learned proxy counsel prayed for an adjournmentas arguing counsel was notavailable. Fresh notice could not be issued as process fee was returned under objection. Prior thereto also stepswerenottakenforserviceofrespondentNo.2.
Petitionsand applications are dismissedfornon-prosecution.
MUKTA GUPTA,J.
FEBRUARY 14,2017 'v mittal' 2017:DHC:8624
JUDGMENT