Full Text
Translation output
$-25,27,32-35,44,47-49&51 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.ICl 9931/2016.C.M.APPL.39480/2016 ENVIRO INFRA ENGINEERS PVT LTD Petitioner
W.P.ICl 9931/2016.C.M.APPL.39480/2016 ENVIRO INFRA ENGINEERS PVT LTD Petitioner
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF VAT& ANR. Respondents W.p.rci 11911/2016
M/S SUNANDA PACKAGING PVT LIMITED' Petitioner
M/S SUNANDA PACKAGING PVT LIMITED' Petitioner
VERSUS
THE COMMISSIONER OFVAT & ANR. Respondents W.P.tCl 696/2017
VINAY SURGICAL Petitioner
VINAY SURGICAL Petitioner
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE&TAXES & ANR Respondents
W.P.fCl 697/2017
W.P.fCl 697/2017
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE &TAXES & ANR Respondents
W.P.rCl 698/2017 RADIANT ELECTRICALS PVT.LTD. Petitioner
W.P.rCl 698/2017 RADIANT ELECTRICALS PVT.LTD. Petitioner
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER,TRADE& TAXES & ANR Respondents W.PTCl699/2017
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE& TAXES & ANR Respondents
W.P.(C)823/2017
SAALINTERNATIONAL(MEDICAL) Petitioner
SAALINTERNATIONAL(MEDICAL) Petitioner
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER,TRADE 8c TAXES& ANR. ..... Respondents
Page I of3 2017:DHC:8881-DB W.p.(0 11571/2016.C.M. APPT, L.R.SHARMA&CO. petitioner
Page I of3 2017:DHC:8881-DB W.p.(0 11571/2016.C.M. APPT, L.R.SHARMA&CO. petitioner
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER,TRADE&TAXES&ANR Respondents
W.PTCI 11573/2016.C.M.APPL.45597/2016
L.R.SHARMA &CO. Petitioner
L.R.SHARMA &CO. Petitioner
VERSUS
W.PTCI 11578/2016.C.M.APPL.45608/2nifi
L.R.SHARMA & CO. Petitioner
L.R.SHARMA & CO. Petitioner
VERSUS
W.PTQ 11660/2016
NATIONALINDUSTRIESINDIA Petitioner ^
NATIONALINDUSTRIESINDIA Petitioner ^
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAXES Respondent
Through : Sh. Vasdev Lalwani,Sh. Sunil Agarwal and Sh. Rohit Gautam, Advocates, for petitioner, in Item No.25.
Sh.S.K.Khurana,Advocate,for petitioner,in Item
Nos.32,33 and 35.
Sh. Nitin Gulati, Advocate,for petitioner, in Item
No.44.
Sh. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate, for respondents, in Item
Nos.25 & 51.
Sh. Mamneet Singh, Advocate, for GNCTD, in ItemNos.27,32,33 &35.
Sh.Siddharth Dutta,Advocate,for respondents,in
Item Nos.34 &44.
Sh. Satyakam, ASC with Sh. Naveen Jaldiar, Advocate,for GNCTD,inItem Nos.47to 49.
Page 2of3
Through : Sh. Vasdev Lalwani,Sh. Sunil Agarwal and Sh. Rohit Gautam, Advocates, for petitioner, in Item No.25.
Sh.S.K.Khurana,Advocate,for petitioner,in Item
Nos.32,33 and 35.
Sh. Nitin Gulati, Advocate,for petitioner, in Item
No.44.
Sh. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC with Ms. Deboshree Mukherjee, Advocate, for respondents, in Item
Nos.25 & 51.
Sh. Mamneet Singh, Advocate, for GNCTD, in ItemNos.27,32,33 &35.
Sh.Siddharth Dutta,Advocate,for respondents,in
Item Nos.34 &44.
Sh. Satyakam, ASC with Sh. Naveen Jaldiar, Advocate,for GNCTD,inItem Nos.47to 49.
Page 2of3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR;
JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
15.02:2017 ^ The respondent/DVAT Departmentstates thatthe refund claims have been approved and that appropriate orders would be made and that amounts will be paid. In all these cases, the respondents shall ensure that refund orders arc made in respect of the pending claim applications within two weeks.In alleases,the amounts together with interest shall be remitted to the petitioners' accounts within 10 days.
The writ petitions are disposed ofin the above terms.
S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J NAJMI«WAZIRI,J FEBRUARY 15,2017/ajk
Page 3 of3
HON'BLE MR;
JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
15.02:2017 ^ The respondent/DVAT Departmentstates thatthe refund claims have been approved and that appropriate orders would be made and that amounts will be paid. In all these cases, the respondents shall ensure that refund orders arc made in respect of the pending claim applications within two weeks.In alleases,the amounts together with interest shall be remitted to the petitioners' accounts within 10 days.
The writ petitions are disposed ofin the above terms.
S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J NAJMI«WAZIRI,J FEBRUARY 15,2017/ajk
Page 3 of3
JUDGMENT