Ravinder Parkash Punj v. The New Delhi Municipal Council

Delhi High Court · 17 Feb 2017 · 2017:DHC:991
Hima Kohli
WP(C) 1344/2017
2017:DHC:991
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the NDMC assessment order, directing the petitioner to first exhaust the statutory appeal remedy under Section 115 of the NDMC Act.

Full Text
Translation output
WP(C)1344/2017
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 1344/2017 & CMs 6128-29/2017
RAVINDER PARKASH PUNJ ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Anoop Bhambani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raman Gandhi, Advocate
VERSUS
THE NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS..... Respondents
Through : Mr. Arjun Mitra, Advocate for NDMC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI O R D E R 17.02.2017
JUDGMENT

1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside the assessment order dated 12.5.2016 whereunder, the existing rateable value in respect of property bearing No.10, Prithvi Raj Road, New Delhi has been assessed at a new rateable value for the period w.e.f. 2004-2005 till 2015-2016.

2. In view of the fact that the statute provides for an alternate efficacious remedy of filing an appeal before the learned Additional District Judge, as contemplated under Section 115 of the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 (in short ‘the Act’), this court is of the opinion that the petitioner ought to first approach the said forum for appropriate relief.

3. Mr. Bhambani, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioner states on instructions, that the petitioner shall approach the Appellate 2017:DHC:991 WP(C)1344/2017 Authority under Section 115 of the Act and request the said court to permit him to deposit the property tax payable for one assessment year for laying a challenge to the impugned order dated 12.5.2016 whereunder, the rateable value in respect of the subject property has been revised at one go, for several years. Such a request, if made, shall be considered by the appellate authority and a decision taken in accordance with law.

4. Counsel for the respondent No.1/NDMC, who appears on advance copy, states that if the petitioner files an appeal against the assessment order, then the respondent/NDMC reserves its right to challenge its maintainability on the ground of delay, under Sections 116 & 117 of the Act.

5. The present petition is accordingly disposed of, along with the pending applications, with liberty granted to the petitioner to invoke the provisions of Section 115 of the NDMC Act. HIMA KOHLI, J FEBRUARY 17, 2017 sk/mk/ap