Rajni v. Delhi Cantonment Board

Delhi High Court · 27 Feb 2017 · 2017:DHC:9027
Manmohan
W.P.(C)1772/2017
2017:DHC:9027
administrative other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions on the petitioners' withdrawal with liberty to file appeals, without expressing any opinion on the merits.

Full Text
Translation output
$-42&43 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C)1772/2017& C.M.Nos.7851-7852/2017
RAJNI Petitioner
Through Mj.Priyanka Sharma with Mr.Anusuya, Advocates.
VERSUS
DELHI CANTONMENTBOARD& ANR Respondents
Through Mr.AnchitSharma with Mr.Tarveen Singh Nanda,Advocatesfor R-1 &2.
W.P.(C)1773/2017& C.M.Nos.7853-7854/2017
KAMLESH Petitioner
Through Mr.Priyanka Sharma with Mr.Anusuya, Advocates.
VERSUS
DELHICANTONMENT BOARD & ANR Respondents
Through Mr.AnchitSharma with Mr.Tarveen Singh Nanda,Advocatesfor R-1 &2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN
27.02.2017 After some arguments,learned counsel for the petitioners wishes to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to file appeals in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petitions stand disposed of. This Court, however,clarifies that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits ofthe controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are leftopen. 1 i
MANMI^HAN,J FEBRUARY 27,2017/KA 2017:DHC:9027
JUDGMENT