Full Text
Translation output
21&22 •
•
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 4686/2016 & CMAPPL.. 19552/2016
, HAMID HASAN Petitioner
Through; Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Advocate with Mr^Rajat, Advocate.
•
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 4686/2016 & CMAPPL.. 19552/2016
, HAMID HASAN Petitioner
Through; Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Advocate with Mr^Rajat, Advocate.
VERSUS
DELHI JAL BOARD Respondent
Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkama, Advocate with Mr, Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocate.
Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkama, Advocate with Mr, Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocate.
And
W.P.(C)4698/2016& CM APPL. 19582/2016
MADHAVGOEL .....Petitioner , Through; Mr. SudhirNaagar, Advocate with
Mr. Rajat, Advocate.
MADHAVGOEL .....Petitioner , Through; Mr. SudhirNaagar, Advocate with
Mr. Rajat, Advocate.
VERSUS
DELHI JAL BOARD & ANR .....Respondents
Through; Mr. Sumeet Pushkama, Advocate with Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocate.
Through; Mr. Sumeet Pushkama, Advocate with Mr. Siddhartha Nagpal, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
ORDER o/o 10.03.2017 , Learned counsel, for respondent-DJB states that respondent shall decide the petitioners' representations dated OS*^*^ May, 2016 in accordance
2017:DHC:8125 with law and keeping in view the contentions advanced by the learned counsel for petitioners.
Keeping in view the aforesaid, present writ petitions and applications are disposed of with a direction to respondent to decide the petitioners' representations dated OS'" May, 2016 in accordance with law by way of a reasoned order after keeping in view the contentions advanced in the present proceedings.
However, it is clarified that the interim protection granted by this
Court vide order dated OS'^ June, 2016 shall continue to operate for aperiod of two weeks after the disposal of the representations by the respondent-
DJB.
MANMOHAN, J MARCH 10,2017 js 2017:DHC:8125
ORDER o/o 10.03.2017 , Learned counsel, for respondent-DJB states that respondent shall decide the petitioners' representations dated OS*^*^ May, 2016 in accordance
2017:DHC:8125 with law and keeping in view the contentions advanced by the learned counsel for petitioners.
Keeping in view the aforesaid, present writ petitions and applications are disposed of with a direction to respondent to decide the petitioners' representations dated OS'" May, 2016 in accordance with law by way of a reasoned order after keeping in view the contentions advanced in the present proceedings.
However, it is clarified that the interim protection granted by this
Court vide order dated OS'^ June, 2016 shall continue to operate for aperiod of two weeks after the disposal of the representations by the respondent-
DJB.
MANMOHAN, J MARCH 10,2017 js 2017:DHC:8125
JUDGMENT