Sitanta Das v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 10 Mar 2017 · 2017:DHC:1459
Hima Kohli
W.P.(C) 2168/2017
2017:DHC:1459
administrative appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition concerning the definition of 'remote/difficult areas' under the Postgraduate Medical Education Regulation, 2000, with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 2168/2017 & CM 9433/2017
SITANTA DAS ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pardeep Dahiya, Advocate
VERSUS
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Shruti Munjal, Advocate for R-1.
Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate for R-2.
Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate for R-3.
Mr. T. Singhdev, Advocate for R-4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI O R D E R 10.03.2017
JUDGMENT

1. After addressing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, while reserving the right of his client to file a fresh petition for directions to the respondent No.1/Govt. of NCT of Delhi to define ‘remote/difficult areas’, as contemplated in Regulation 9 (VII) of the Postgraduate Medical Education Regulation, 2000.

2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. As and when the petitioner files a fresh petition, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. Liberty is granted to the respondents to take all the pleas as may be available to them, both on facts and in law, to oppose the same.

3. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, along with the pending application. HIMA KOHLI, J MARCH 10, 2017/sk/ap