Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) Nos. 4739 /2015 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 10.03.2017
W.P.(C) 4739/2015
NARAIN DASS ..... Petitioner
NARAIN DASS ..... Petitioner
versus
DELHI URBAN SHELTER
IMPROVEMENT BOARD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in the case:
For the Petitioner : Ms Noopur Singhal and Mr Akhilesh Arora, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mr Parvinder Chauhan, Advocate for DUSIB.
IMPROVEMENT BOARD ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in the case:
For the Petitioner : Ms Noopur Singhal and Mr Akhilesh Arora, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mr Parvinder Chauhan, Advocate for DUSIB.
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL)
CM No.9501/2017(early hearing)
Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the respondent.
For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The Writ Petition is taken up for hearing today.
The application stands disposed of accordingly.
CM No.9501/2017(early hearing)
Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for the respondent.
For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The Writ Petition is taken up for hearing today.
The application stands disposed of accordingly.
W.P.(C) 4739/2015
The petitioner has impugned the order dated 17.09.2014, inter alia, on the ground that the petitioner was not given an opportunity of
2017:DHC:1463 W.P.(C) Nos. 4739 /2015 representing the case. Learned counsel for the respondent, under instructions, submits that respondent is willing to grant fresh opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and then pass an order afresh.
In view of the above, the order dated 17.09.2014 is set aside.
The respondents are directed to give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and then pass a reasoned speaking order.
It is clarified that this Court has not examined the merits and contentions of either party.
The Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
The next date of 18.05.2017 is cancelled.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
MARCH 10, 2017
‘Sn’
2017:DHC:1463
The petitioner has impugned the order dated 17.09.2014, inter alia, on the ground that the petitioner was not given an opportunity of
2017:DHC:1463 W.P.(C) Nos. 4739 /2015 representing the case. Learned counsel for the respondent, under instructions, submits that respondent is willing to grant fresh opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and then pass an order afresh.
In view of the above, the order dated 17.09.2014 is set aside.
The respondents are directed to give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and then pass a reasoned speaking order.
It is clarified that this Court has not examined the merits and contentions of either party.
The Writ Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
The next date of 18.05.2017 is cancelled.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
MARCH 10, 2017
‘Sn’
2017:DHC:1463