Full Text
Translation output
9-^ $-15 to 17 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)1053/2016
M/S SCINDIA POTTERIES& SERVICESPVT LTD Petitioner
Through Mr.Virender Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
CONT.CAS(C)1053/2016
M/S SCINDIA POTTERIES& SERVICESPVT LTD Petitioner
Through Mr.Virender Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
VERSUS
SHER SINGH& ANR Respondents
Through Respondentin person.
Through Respondentin person.
CONT.CAS(C)1061/2016
M/S SCINDIA POTTERIES & SERVICES PVT LTD Petitioner
Advocate.
M/S SCINDIA POTTERIES & SERVICES PVT LTD Petitioner
Advocate.
VERSUS
ARJUN Respondent
CONT.CAS(C)1127/2016
M/S SCINDIA POTTERIES& SERVICES PVT LTD Petitioner
Advocate.
M/S SCINDIA POTTERIES& SERVICES PVT LTD Petitioner
Advocate.
VERSUS
DAULATRAM Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN
02.03.2017 Present contempt petitions have been filed alleging wilful
2017:DHC:8505 disobedience ofthe orders wherein the respondents had undertaken to vacate the premises at Scindia Potteries Labour Quarters Complex, Sarojini Nagar,New Delhi on or before 31®^December,2015.
Since despite the aforesaid undertaking, the respondents had not vacated the premises,notices were issued returnable for today.
In response to the notices issued,the respondents are personally present today in Court. They pray for some time to vacate the premises. However,the petitioner is willing to extend the time only by a period ofone month.
At this stage,the respondents state that they would vacate the premises on or before 3CMarch,2017. They further state thatin the event the said premises are not vacated by 3C March, 2017, they would have no objection if the local SHO gets the said premises vacated.
The statements made by the respondents are accepted by this
Court and the respondents are held bound by the same.
Accordingly,the presentcontempt petitions stand disposed of.
However,the matters are directed to be listed for compliance on13'"April,2017. y
MANMOHAN,J MARCH 02,2017 KA it J h 21 to 23 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)1053/2016
M/S SCINDIA POTTERIES & SERVICES PVT LTD Petitioner
Tlirough: Mr.Virender Kr.Sharma,Advocate.
02.03.2017 Present contempt petitions have been filed alleging wilful
2017:DHC:8505 disobedience ofthe orders wherein the respondents had undertaken to vacate the premises at Scindia Potteries Labour Quarters Complex, Sarojini Nagar,New Delhi on or before 31®^December,2015.
Since despite the aforesaid undertaking, the respondents had not vacated the premises,notices were issued returnable for today.
In response to the notices issued,the respondents are personally present today in Court. They pray for some time to vacate the premises. However,the petitioner is willing to extend the time only by a period ofone month.
At this stage,the respondents state that they would vacate the premises on or before 3CMarch,2017. They further state thatin the event the said premises are not vacated by 3C March, 2017, they would have no objection if the local SHO gets the said premises vacated.
The statements made by the respondents are accepted by this
Court and the respondents are held bound by the same.
Accordingly,the presentcontempt petitions stand disposed of.
However,the matters are directed to be listed for compliance on13'"April,2017. y
MANMOHAN,J MARCH 02,2017 KA it J h 21 to 23 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)1053/2016
M/S SCINDIA POTTERIES & SERVICES PVT LTD Petitioner
Tlirough: Mr.Virender Kr.Sharma,Advocate.
VERSUS
SEDER SINGH& ANR Respondents
Through:None.
Through:None.
WITH
CONT.CAS(C)1061/2016
AND SERVICES PVT LTD Petitioner
Through:Mr.Virender Kr.Sharma,Advocate.
AND SERVICES PVT LTD Petitioner
Through:Mr.Virender Kr.Sharma,Advocate.
VERSUS
ARJUN Respondent AND
CONT.CAS(C)1127/2016
AND SERVICES PRIVATE LTD Petitioner
Through: Mr.Virender Kr.Sharma,Advocate.
AND SERVICES PRIVATE LTD Petitioner
Through: Mr.Virender Kr.Sharma,Advocate.
VERSUS
J s DAULAT RAM Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN
13.04.2017 Learned counsel for petitioner states that respondents have handed over the possession ofthe premises in question.
Since the contempt petitions stand satisfied, they need not be listed any further.
MANMOHAN,J APRIL 13,2017 js
13.04.2017 Learned counsel for petitioner states that respondents have handed over the possession ofthe premises in question.
Since the contempt petitions stand satisfied, they need not be listed any further.
MANMOHAN,J APRIL 13,2017 js
JUDGMENT