Full Text
Translation output
r" HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C)2108/2017.
VIDYA BHARTI SCHOOL Petitioner
Through: Mr.Atul Bandhu,Adv. '
W.P.(C)2108/2017.
VIDYA BHARTI SCHOOL Petitioner
Through: Mr.Atul Bandhu,Adv. '
VERSUS
CHANDERSINGH & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr. Shatrajit Banerjee,Adv.for Mr. , Gautam Narayan,Adv.for R-2.
Through: Mr. Shatrajit Banerjee,Adv.for Mr. , Gautam Narayan,Adv.for R-2.
W.P.(C)2110/2017 '
VIDYA BHARTI SCHOOL , Petitioner
Through: Mr.Atul Bandhu,Adv.
VIDYA BHARTI SCHOOL , Petitioner
Through: Mr.Atul Bandhu,Adv.
VERSUS
SHREEPAL & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr.Shatrajit Banerjee,Adv.for Mr. Gautam Narayan,Adv.for R-2.
Through: Mr.Shatrajit Banerjee,Adv.for Mr. Gautam Narayan,Adv.for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VALMIKIJ.MEHTA
07.03.2017
07.03.2017
ORDER
1.. After arguments, these writ petitions are disposed of as not pressed but liberty as prayed for is granted to the petitioner/school to initiate departmental proceedings againstthe employees who are respondent no. 1 in each of the aforesaid writ petitions, inasmuch as, the petitioner/school contends that the employees in question could not have joined the services ofthe schpol as they lack the eligibility criteria for appointment.
2. n The writ petitions and the pending applications are, accordingly, disposed of.giving the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner/school to take out 2017:DHC:9025 departmental proceedings against such employees as the petitioner/school thinks do not satisfy the eligibility criteria for appointment to the petitioner/school.
MARCH 07,2017 ib VALMIKIJ.MEHTA,J