Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TR.P.(CRL.)30/2016
TR.P.(CRL.)30/2016
TR.P.(CRL.)33/2016
TR.P.(CRL.)34/2016
HKK BUILDWELL PVT.LTD.
Petitioner
Through: Mr.Shiv Chopra,Advocate
HKK BUILDWELL PVT.LTD.
Petitioner
Through: Mr.Shiv Chopra,Advocate
VERSUS
STATE OF DELHI & ORS Respondent
Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal,APP Ms.Radhika Kolluru,APP
Mr.B.P.Lathwal,Adv for R-2
Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal,APP Ms.Radhika Kolluru,APP
Mr.B.P.Lathwal,Adv for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
08.03.2017 The petitioner has preferred the aforesaid three petitions to seek the transfer of CC No.896/2016(T.P. Crl No.30/2016), CC No.679/2016(T.P.
Crl No.33/2016) and CC No.l102/2016 (T.P. Crl No.34/2016), which are presently pending before the learned MM Saket Courts and Patiala House
Courts,to the court ofSh.Ashok Kumar,learned MM,Patiala House Courts before whom two other complaints being CC Nos.940/2016 and 932/2016 are already pending.
2017:DHC:8226 The petitioners in the aforesaid petitions are accused in the said cases.
Counsel for the respondent/ complainant states that he has no objection to the transfer ofthe said complaints to the court ofSh. Ashok Kumar,MM, Patiala House Courts. He,however,submits that the complaints have been pending since 2007-08 and his grievance is that the petitioner is seeking to delay the trial ofthe said cases.
Learned counsel for the petitioner assures thatthe petitioners have no such intention. He further submits that the petitioners shall not seek any undue adjournment before the Trial Court post transfer either in the present cases or in othertwo cases already pending before it.
Accordingly,the petitions are allowed. CC Nos.896/2016, 1102/2016 and 679/2016 taken note of herein above, stand transferred to the court of
Sh. Ashok Kumar,learned MM,Patiala House Courts to be heard and tried along with CC Nos.940/2016 and 932/2016. Neither party shall seek nor be granted any undue adjournment by the Trial Court. The Trial Court is requested to dispose ofthe complaintcases as early as possible.
The petitions stand disposed ofin the aforesaid terms.
VIPIN SA G
MARCH 08,2017 sr 2017:DHC:8226
08.03.2017 The petitioner has preferred the aforesaid three petitions to seek the transfer of CC No.896/2016(T.P. Crl No.30/2016), CC No.679/2016(T.P.
Crl No.33/2016) and CC No.l102/2016 (T.P. Crl No.34/2016), which are presently pending before the learned MM Saket Courts and Patiala House
Courts,to the court ofSh.Ashok Kumar,learned MM,Patiala House Courts before whom two other complaints being CC Nos.940/2016 and 932/2016 are already pending.
2017:DHC:8226 The petitioners in the aforesaid petitions are accused in the said cases.
Counsel for the respondent/ complainant states that he has no objection to the transfer ofthe said complaints to the court ofSh. Ashok Kumar,MM, Patiala House Courts. He,however,submits that the complaints have been pending since 2007-08 and his grievance is that the petitioner is seeking to delay the trial ofthe said cases.
Learned counsel for the petitioner assures thatthe petitioners have no such intention. He further submits that the petitioners shall not seek any undue adjournment before the Trial Court post transfer either in the present cases or in othertwo cases already pending before it.
Accordingly,the petitions are allowed. CC Nos.896/2016, 1102/2016 and 679/2016 taken note of herein above, stand transferred to the court of
Sh. Ashok Kumar,learned MM,Patiala House Courts to be heard and tried along with CC Nos.940/2016 and 932/2016. Neither party shall seek nor be granted any undue adjournment by the Trial Court. The Trial Court is requested to dispose ofthe complaintcases as early as possible.
The petitions stand disposed ofin the aforesaid terms.
VIPIN SA G
MARCH 08,2017 sr 2017:DHC:8226
JUDGMENT