Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1454/2016 & Crl.M.A. Nqs.6217/2016 & 3568/2017
LEKH RAJ Petitioner
Through : Mr. Rohit Singh and Mr. Sadashiv Gupta, Advs.
CRL.M.C. 1454/2016 & Crl.M.A. Nqs.6217/2016 & 3568/2017
LEKH RAJ Petitioner
Through : Mr. Rohit Singh and Mr. Sadashiv Gupta, Advs.
VERSUS
\ STATE (NCI OF DELHI) & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for R-1 to 4 with Dinesh Tiwari, ACP/DIU and
Inspector Sandeep Gupta, DIU/West.
Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary and Mr. Arindam Dey, Advs. for R-5 with R-5 in person.
Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for R-1 to 4 with Dinesh Tiwari, ACP/DIU and
Inspector Sandeep Gupta, DIU/West.
Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary and Mr. Arindam Dey, Advs. for R-5 with R-5 in person.
W.P.(CRL) 2118/2015 & Crl.M.A. Nos.13996/2015 & 3484/2017
ASHOK KUMAR MEHTA Petitioner
Through : Mr. Pranay Raj Singh, Adv.
ASHOK KUMAR MEHTA Petitioner
Through : Mr. Pranay Raj Singh, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE (NCT OFDELHI) & ORS Respondents
Through : Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for R-1 to 4 with
Dinesh Tiwari, ACP/DIU and Inspector SandeepGupta, DIU/West.
Mr. Rohit Singh and Mr. Sadashiv Gupta, Advs. for R-5 with R-5 in person.
Through : Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for R-1 to 4 with
Dinesh Tiwari, ACP/DIU and Inspector SandeepGupta, DIU/West.
Mr. Rohit Singh and Mr. Sadashiv Gupta, Advs. for R-5 with R-5 in person.
W.P.(CRL) 2119/2015 &Crl.M.A.3483/2017 &Crl.M.A.13998/2015
KAVITA KHANNA Petitioner
Through; Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary and Mr. Arindam Dey, Advs.
KAVITA KHANNA Petitioner
Through; Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary and Mr. Arindam Dey, Advs.
VERSUS
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) &ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for R-1 to4with 2017:DHC:8582 person.
Through: Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for R-1 to4with 2017:DHC:8582 person.
W.P.(CRL) 2120/2015 & Crl.M.A. Nos. 14000/2015 & 3481/2017
RANJIT MEHTA Petitioner
Through : Mr. Saket Sikri and Mr. Junaid Nahvi, \ Advs.
RANJIT MEHTA Petitioner
Through : Mr. Saket Sikri and Mr. Junaid Nahvi, \ Advs.
VERSUS
STATE ( NCT OFDELHI) & ORS Respondents
Through : Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for R-1 to 4 with
Inspector Sandeep Gupta, DlU/West. person.
Through : Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for R-1 to 4 with
Inspector Sandeep Gupta, DlU/West. person.
AND
W.P.(CRL) 2136/2015 & Crl.M.A. Nos. 14132/2015 & 3482/2017
AVNEESH CHAUDHARY Petitioner
Through : Mr. Rajendra Soni, Adv.
AVNEESH CHAUDHARY Petitioner
Through : Mr. Rajendra Soni, Adv.
VERSUS
J
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC for R-1 to 4 with Dinesh Tiwari, ACP/DIU and person.
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC for R-1 to 4 with Dinesh Tiwari, ACP/DIU and person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
09.03.2017 By these petitions, it has been prayed that the two cross FIRs may be quashed, details whereof are as under:-
(a) FIR No. 14/2013 under Sections 500/509/292/384/354/506/120-B IPG and Sections 66A/67/67A of IT Act registered at police station Janak
Puri on the complaint ofMs. Kavita Khanna.
(b)FIR No.15/2013 under Sections 342/506/34 IPG and Sections 3 (x) of
SG & ST Act, 1989 on the complaint ofMr. Lekh Raj.
It is submitted that the parties have settled their disputes before the
Delhi High Gourt Mediation and Gonciliation Gentre on 6 February, 2017.
Photocopy of the settlement report has been placed on record and perused.
Ms. Kavita Khanna and Mr. Lekh Raj, complainants in the aforesaid FIRs are present in Gourt and have been identified by AGP Dinesh Tiwari, DIU.
They submit that they have settled all their disputes amicably and are not willing to pursue the FIRs any further. It is further submitted by them that the settlement has been arrived at between them of their own free will and without any undue force, pressureor coercion.
Learned Additional Standing Gounsel opposes the quashing of FIRs.
However, since the parties have settled their disputes before the mediation centre and they are not willing to pursue the FIRs any further, I am of the view that FIRs can be quashed. Accordingly, the above noted FIRs and the consequentproceedings emanatingtherefrom, are quashed.
Petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed ofas infructuous.
.id^ATOAK,J.
MARCH 09,2017/dk
09.03.2017 By these petitions, it has been prayed that the two cross FIRs may be quashed, details whereof are as under:-
(a) FIR No. 14/2013 under Sections 500/509/292/384/354/506/120-B IPG and Sections 66A/67/67A of IT Act registered at police station Janak
Puri on the complaint ofMs. Kavita Khanna.
(b)FIR No.15/2013 under Sections 342/506/34 IPG and Sections 3 (x) of
SG & ST Act, 1989 on the complaint ofMr. Lekh Raj.
It is submitted that the parties have settled their disputes before the
Delhi High Gourt Mediation and Gonciliation Gentre on 6 February, 2017.
Photocopy of the settlement report has been placed on record and perused.
Ms. Kavita Khanna and Mr. Lekh Raj, complainants in the aforesaid FIRs are present in Gourt and have been identified by AGP Dinesh Tiwari, DIU.
They submit that they have settled all their disputes amicably and are not willing to pursue the FIRs any further. It is further submitted by them that the settlement has been arrived at between them of their own free will and without any undue force, pressureor coercion.
Learned Additional Standing Gounsel opposes the quashing of FIRs.
However, since the parties have settled their disputes before the mediation centre and they are not willing to pursue the FIRs any further, I am of the view that FIRs can be quashed. Accordingly, the above noted FIRs and the consequentproceedings emanatingtherefrom, are quashed.
Petitions are disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applications are disposed ofas infructuous.
.id^ATOAK,J.
MARCH 09,2017/dk
JUDGMENT