Mr.Nitin Gulati,Adv. v. COMMISSIONER,TRADE&TAXES& ANR

Delhi High Court · 22 Mar 2017 · 2017:DHC:8195-DB
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT; HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI; S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J MARCH 22,2017 NAJMI WAZIRI,J
2017:DHC:8195-DB
tax appeal_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the Revenue to grant interest on approved DVAT refund claims with speaking orders explaining any denial and allowed petitioners to approach the VAT Appellate Tribunal for disputes.

Full Text
Translation output
$-10&24 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C)1521/2017
AHUJA INTERNATIONAL Petitioner
Through:Mr.Nitin Gulati,Adv.
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER,TRADE&TAXES& ANR Respondents
Through:Mr.Anuj Aggarwal,Adv.
W.P.(C)1560/2017
H.M.INTERNATIONAL Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rajesh Jain,Adv.
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF TRADE&TAXES Respondent
Through:Mr.Anuj Aggarwal,Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
22.03.2017 It is stated that the refund claims have been approved but without interest. In such cases,the Revenue shall indicate by separate reasons why interest has not been granted and pass a speaking order to be issued to the assessee/petitioner within two weeks. The DVAT
Department shall ensure that the amounts shall be credited to the petitioners' accounts,within a week.
2017:DHC:8195-DB h In case of any dispute or discrepancy, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the VATO, who shall make his reasoned order dealing with such objection, within 30 days of receipt of such application.
The writ petitions and the pending applications are disposed off.
A copy of this order be given dasti to parties under the signatures ofthe Court Master.
S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J MARCH 22,2017 NAJMI WAZIRI,J
2017:DHC:8195-DB
JUDGMENT