Full Text
Translation output
$-1,2and 10 to 13 ■
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
- + . W.P.(G)2221/2017 (2) W.P.(C).2223/2017 (10)W.P.(C)1766/2017 .
,. t(H)W.P.(Cn768/2017 -f(12)W.P.'(C)1776/2017
(13)W.P.(C)1989/2017&CM No.8791/2017 .
/'T JAGDAMBA PRIVATE ITI. NEW LAL BAHADUR SHASTRIPRIVATE ITI
GULAB ANJANICHOUDHARiINDUSTRIAL ' . . TRAINGING CENTRE
GIRDHARI CHOUDIL^INDUSTRIAL TRAINING CENTRE \ SAIPRIVATEITI , VINDHAYANCHAL PRIVATE ITI .....Petitioners
Through: Mr.Sanjay.Sharawat,Adv. .
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
- + . W.P.(G)2221/2017 (2) W.P.(C).2223/2017 (10)W.P.(C)1766/2017 .
,. t(H)W.P.(Cn768/2017 -f(12)W.P.'(C)1776/2017
(13)W.P.(C)1989/2017&CM No.8791/2017 .
/'T JAGDAMBA PRIVATE ITI. NEW LAL BAHADUR SHASTRIPRIVATE ITI
GULAB ANJANICHOUDHARiINDUSTRIAL ' . . TRAINGING CENTRE
GIRDHARI CHOUDIL^INDUSTRIAL TRAINING CENTRE \ SAIPRIVATEITI , VINDHAYANCHAL PRIVATE ITI .....Petitioners
Through: Mr.Sanjay.Sharawat,Adv. .
VERSUS
DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF TRAINING
&ANR' .....Respondents
Through: Mr.C.M.Gdyal,Adv.for R1 with Mr.Bhagat Singh,(TO)
(DGT)., . - Mr.Sagar Shivam,Adv.for Mr.Vikas Chopra,Adv.for R2.
€■ CORAM:
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
24.03.2017
' . - • to -
• ' Mr. C.M., Goyal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.l states that respondent no.l has written to the State Directorate to constitute an Inspection Committee (s) for verification / inspection,of infrastructure of
2017:DHC:9132 the petitioner institutes for shifting ofthe premises to its new location as per the NCVT norms and submit the recommendations of the Inspection
Committee (s). He further states that on the basis ofthe recommendations final decision shall be taken by the respondent no.l within 8 weeks. He has
"placed before me the letter dated 23^'^ March, 2017 in support of his submission. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the said statement of Mr. Goyal, Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners state that nothing further survives for consideration in the writ petitions and the writ petitions may be disposed ofas such.Ordered accordingly.
^ CM No.8791/2017in W.P.(C)No.1989/2017 Dismissed as infructuous.
V.KAMESWAR RAO,J ^ MARCH 24,2017^;g 2017:DHC:9132
&ANR' .....Respondents
Through: Mr.C.M.Gdyal,Adv.for R1 with Mr.Bhagat Singh,(TO)
(DGT)., . - Mr.Sagar Shivam,Adv.for Mr.Vikas Chopra,Adv.for R2.
€■ CORAM:
HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
24.03.2017
' . - • to -
• ' Mr. C.M., Goyal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.l states that respondent no.l has written to the State Directorate to constitute an Inspection Committee (s) for verification / inspection,of infrastructure of
2017:DHC:9132 the petitioner institutes for shifting ofthe premises to its new location as per the NCVT norms and submit the recommendations of the Inspection
Committee (s). He further states that on the basis ofthe recommendations final decision shall be taken by the respondent no.l within 8 weeks. He has
"placed before me the letter dated 23^'^ March, 2017 in support of his submission. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the said statement of Mr. Goyal, Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners state that nothing further survives for consideration in the writ petitions and the writ petitions may be disposed ofas such.Ordered accordingly.
^ CM No.8791/2017in W.P.(C)No.1989/2017 Dismissed as infructuous.
V.KAMESWAR RAO,J ^ MARCH 24,2017^;g 2017:DHC:9132
JUDGMENT