Mr.S.K.Khurana,Adv. v. COMMISSIONEROFTRADE&TAXES&ANR

Delhi High Court · 28 Mar 2017 · 2017:DHC:8109-DB
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT; HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI; S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J NAJMI^AZIRI,J MARCH 28,2017/acm
2017:DHC:8109-DB
tax other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the Revenue to provide reasons for denying interest on approved VAT refund claims and mandated reconsideration of petitioners' representations within a month.

Full Text
Translation output
..V $-10,13,18,42,71,74 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C)1756/2017 globeinsulation CO. Petitioner
Through:Mr.S.K.Khurana,Adv.
VERSUS
COMMISSIONEROFTRADE&TAXES&ANR Respondent
Through:Mr.Siddharth Dutta,Adv
W.P.(C)2045/2017
KPSENGINEERING WORKS Petitioner
VERSUS
Through:Mr.Avtar Singh,Adv.
W.P.(C)2119/2017
M/S ANILENGG.WORKS Petitioner
Through:Mr.BharatKumar Tripathi,Adv.
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OFDELHI VALUE ADDED TAX& ANR. P , Respondent
Ihrough:Mr.Varun Nischal,Adv.
W.P.(C)1754/2017 globeINSULATIONCO. pe,i,iener
VERSUS
Through:Mr.Siddharth Dutta,Adv. 2017:DHC:8109-DB
V
/ / /
W.P.(C)12127/2016
/ INFINITEPRINTSOLUTIONS Petitioner / Through:Mr.Vasdev Lalwani,Adv.
VERSUS
1, COMMISSIONEROF VAT&ANR. Respondent I Through:Mr.Rahul Sharma and Mr.C.K.Bhatt i Advs.
W.P.(C)33/2017
TURBOTAPESINDUSTRIES Petitioner
Through:Mr.PuneetBhatia,Adv.
VERSUS
COMMISSIONEROF VALUE ADDEDTAX Respondent
Through:Mr.Shadan Farasat&Mr.Ahmed Said Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE NAJMIWAZIRI
28.03.2017 It is stated that the refund claims in these cases have been approved but without interest. The Revenue will furnish reasons for denying the interest within a week after which it will be open to the petitioners to represent and in that event the VATO shall decide the representations/objections within a month ofitsreceipt.
The writpetitions are disposed off.
S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J NAJMI^AZIRI,J MARCH 28,2017/acm
2017:DHC:8109-DB
JUDGMENT