Full Text
Translation output
'W '
-> V n $-10,11,12,23 , , " HIGH COURT OF DELHI
. W.P.i:C)12135/2016& CM.APPL47943/2016 - ' SUBHASH GRANDER , - Petitioner through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr.Amit
- Kumar Dubey,Advocates
-> V n $-10,11,12,23 , , " HIGH COURT OF DELHI
. W.P.i:C)12135/2016& CM.APPL47943/2016 - ' SUBHASH GRANDER , - Petitioner through Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi and Mr.Amit
- Kumar Dubey,Advocates
VERSUS
- \ .. , . / , NEW DELHIMUNICIPAL COUNCIL ..... Respondent
; Through , Mr.Sri HarshaPeechara,ASC with Mr. : / Mananjay Mishra and Ms.Vidhi Jain, n Advocates for NDMC. -
; Through , Mr.Sri HarshaPeechara,ASC with Mr. : / Mananjay Mishra and Ms.Vidhi Jain, n Advocates for NDMC. -
W.P.(C)458/2017& CM.APPL 2156/2017
MANPJ KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through ": Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi apd Mr.Amit
- — Kumar Dubey,Advocates
MANPJ KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through ": Mr.Satish Kumar Tripathi apd Mr.Amit
- — Kumar Dubey,Advocates
VERSUS
- , - . , ,NEWDELHIMUNICIPAL COUNCIL' ^ ....: Respondent through Mr.SriHarshaPeechara,ASC with Mr. ,: . Mananjay Mishra and Ms.Vidhi Jain, - , " ' n Advocates for NDMC. ■'
, , . ' ; Mr..AshishMohan, Advocate for Palika
Bazar Market Association.
^ + W.P.(C) 1158/2017& CM.APPL 5268/2017 - :
VINOD ^ Petitioner , Through Mr-SatishKumar Tripathi andMr. Amit
' Kumar Dubey, Advocates -
, , . ' ; Mr..AshishMohan, Advocate for Palika
Bazar Market Association.
^ + W.P.(C) 1158/2017& CM.APPL 5268/2017 - :
VINOD ^ Petitioner , Through Mr-SatishKumar Tripathi andMr. Amit
' Kumar Dubey, Advocates -
VERSUS
' NEWDELHIMUNICIPALCOUNCIL ;...:Respondent
Through Mr. SriHarsha-Peechara, ASC withMr.
MananjayMishra andMs. Vidhi Jain, Advocates for NDMC.
2017:DHC:8117-DB i
. + W.P.(e)479/2017'&CM.APPL2206™ , V ;. -CHAKj\ia>ANSINGH ' :' , r n ^ ...Petitioner>
/ / . ', - Through Mr.SatishiKumar Tripathi and Mr:Amit .. , ', n . '; .' : n ; Kumar Diibey,Advocates ' - . n n , , - • • • - V • V' -versus n - NEW.DELfflMUMCIPAL'CO " ...::Respondent -
; . n Thtough ; Mr.Sri HafshaPeechara,;ASC with'Mr. ; n n /' n /Mananjay Mishra andMs;Vidhi Jain, ;
; ' - • Advocates for NDMC. . - - •
'.;;,CORAM:\./'^ ^ - '
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI V / f HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
- ORDER nn ■."
M7.04.2017 ,■ 'T, :
. : : - ^ The petitioners iiiThe above refeifedmatters are aggrieved by the-action v of theNorthDelhiMunicipal Corporation (NDMC) by which they claim to have been removed from Rajiv Chowk; and Indira_Chowk, New';Delhi. Notice was •. issued in thesp matters. Counter, affidavits have been filed. The respondents -
NDMC has taken a' stand that the petitioners,stand removed oh account of the fact that Rajiv Chowk and Indira Chowk have'been declared a 'non-vending', ' 'non-hawking'zone interms ofpara 4.2 ofthepolicy. ' ^ :
,, - Mr..Harsha, learnedcounsel for therespondents'submits that thepolicy of
- the NDMC.as per whichRajiv Chowk andIndira Chowk have been declared as ■ ... ,'hon-vepding', 'non-hawking' zone stands approved-^by the Supreme Court of ■
■ evidently the reading of the orders) dated 17.05.2007 passed in- ; the C3SQ of Sudhir Madan & Others v. Mmicipal Cdrporatidn dfDelhl, , : (WT.(.C.)1699/1987).; LearnedcounselsubmitsthattheMinutesoftheMeeting } held on 10.02,2009 and-the communication ,of"Sukhvinder Kauf,-Presiding
' ; ■ LOfficerofTowriVendingCpmmittee,NDM^ ':'i
Afthis stage,l^^dcouhserfbr thepetitioners wishes to witiidraw-the
, . ;>wntpetitions'asthisgr6uhdwasnot;raisedbyhiminanyoftheto "
.' The writpetitions are dismissedas withdrawn. - . ■ : . - . ^ ^ •
•y
7<- - \
Through Mr. SriHarsha-Peechara, ASC withMr.
MananjayMishra andMs. Vidhi Jain, Advocates for NDMC.
2017:DHC:8117-DB i
. + W.P.(e)479/2017'&CM.APPL2206™ , V ;. -CHAKj\ia>ANSINGH ' :' , r n ^ ...Petitioner>
/ / . ', - Through Mr.SatishiKumar Tripathi and Mr:Amit .. , ', n . '; .' : n ; Kumar Diibey,Advocates ' - . n n , , - • • • - V • V' -versus n - NEW.DELfflMUMCIPAL'CO " ...::Respondent -
; . n Thtough ; Mr.Sri HafshaPeechara,;ASC with'Mr. ; n n /' n /Mananjay Mishra andMs;Vidhi Jain, ;
; ' - • Advocates for NDMC. . - - •
'.;;,CORAM:\./'^ ^ - '
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI V / f HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
- ORDER nn ■."
M7.04.2017 ,■ 'T, :
. : : - ^ The petitioners iiiThe above refeifedmatters are aggrieved by the-action v of theNorthDelhiMunicipal Corporation (NDMC) by which they claim to have been removed from Rajiv Chowk; and Indira_Chowk, New';Delhi. Notice was •. issued in thesp matters. Counter, affidavits have been filed. The respondents -
NDMC has taken a' stand that the petitioners,stand removed oh account of the fact that Rajiv Chowk and Indira Chowk have'been declared a 'non-vending', ' 'non-hawking'zone interms ofpara 4.2 ofthepolicy. ' ^ :
,, - Mr..Harsha, learnedcounsel for therespondents'submits that thepolicy of
- the NDMC.as per whichRajiv Chowk andIndira Chowk have been declared as ■ ... ,'hon-vepding', 'non-hawking' zone stands approved-^by the Supreme Court of ■
■ evidently the reading of the orders) dated 17.05.2007 passed in- ; the C3SQ of Sudhir Madan & Others v. Mmicipal Cdrporatidn dfDelhl, , : (WT.(.C.)1699/1987).; LearnedcounselsubmitsthattheMinutesoftheMeeting } held on 10.02,2009 and-the communication ,of"Sukhvinder Kauf,-Presiding
' ; ■ LOfficerofTowriVendingCpmmittee,NDM^ ':'i
Afthis stage,l^^dcouhserfbr thepetitioners wishes to witiidraw-the
, . ;>wntpetitions'asthisgr6uhdwasnot;raisedbyhiminanyoftheto "
.' The writpetitions are dismissedas withdrawn. - . ■ : . - . ^ ^ •
•y
7<- - \
CM.APPL 47943/2016 in W.P.(C)12135/2016
CM.APPL 2156/2017 in W.P.(C)458/2017
CM.APPL 5268/2017 in W.P.ICV1158/2017 :
CM.APPL 2206/2017in W.P.rO 47972017 The applications also,stand dismissed in view oforders passed above.
■u' .X. G.S.SISTANI, J
APRIL 17, 2017 pst
CM.APPL 2206/2017in W.P.rO 47972017 The applications also,stand dismissed in view oforders passed above.
■u' .X. G.S.SISTANI, J
APRIL 17, 2017 pst
W.P.(C) 12135/2016 etc, VINODGOEL, J
JUDGMENT