A , " v. +■

Delhi High Court · 18 Apr 2017 · 2017:DHC:8101-DB
n " .;," V- n :■ ■--:■■ ■ ■; HON'BLE jVlR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI; T>T -Wl ■« L •; ' Association, grant a personal hearing, consider,their fibcuments andpass ^n' ^; CM.No.16932/2016in W PJcVjfllOmU C.M.No.18905/2016in W.P.(C) 4532/2016; C.M.No.18906/2016 in
2017:DHC:8101-DB
constitutional petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed authorities to consider petitioners' representations and grant personal hearings before eviction, upholding principles of natural justice under Article 226.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.Pi(C)4010/2016&C.M.No.16932/2016(forstay)
A , " Petitioner .T Mr.Kamiesh Kuinar Mislira;Adv./
VERSUS
.+■
/ : . -: ^ ^:.... Respondents.
. Through Ms.ReeniaKh0rana, Adv. forR-l.. " '
/ - A A Bhatt, Adv. for R-2 & 3. - . ;,, ; , P Mr.Archit Sharma, Adv. for R-4. ; ' '
.W.P.(C) 4532/2016 & C.M.No.18905/2016 (for stay) . . .....Petitioner
Through ; Mr.K'anileshKiimar Mishra, Adv. '
VERSUS
.
.,... Respondents
Through Mr.G.D.Mishra, Stahdihg Coiinsel for
- ' - •;,;' :EDMc." ' A' :-;'-'. "--
, . . . Mr.Devesh Singhy ASC witiiMr.Vinod Kumar Bhati, Adv. for GNCTD.
■ J......Petitioner
Through ./IS^.KamleshKumafMisfea/ , v :
VERSUS
y. - ' :; A ; ^ ' ..... Respondents
Through Mr.Mukesh Guptay Ady. with '? : Mr.Prariey Jain,Adv. for NI)MC. "
-^Mr.Dpvesh Singh,',Adv. withMr.Vinod v ,..' Kumar Bhati, Adv.; for GNCTD. , . > " -
2017:DHC:8101-DB ' - 'T- - n
CORAM: n " .;," V- n :■ ■--:■■ ■ ■
HON'BLE jVlR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI
T>T -Wl ■« L •
-^18.04.2017 ' , . Petitioners have filed the present writ petitions pndenArticle 226 of the
.Constitution ofTndia, seeking^^ ofMandamus restraining the respondents fromevictingJhepetitioners anddirections to therespondents to confirmto their statutory obligations.' ' ^ , " v ' .
Ceamed counsel for the petitioners siibmits thaf the members of the petitioner-Association wouldbe'satisfied:if a direction is,issued to respondents v
NpJ^ to consider the representations of the members of the ipetitioner-
' Association, grant a personal hearing, consider,their fibcuments andpass ^n' ^
'-order.' ^ Learned counsels for theMCDbave no objectioninthis regard. Counsel fortheDelhiPolice,submitthatincasetherepresentatibrisofthemembersofthe- ; petitioner-Association are considered favourably, no obstruction would>6 causedin the order so passed by:them. Theywould comply with the orders so r passedby respondentNo;1. , ^ ' f- - •
. -; these writpetitions are dispbsedofaccordih^yj^emakeit cle^ tHisorder wouldapplyonlytothemembers.mentionedinthepetitionsonly. '
CM.No.16932/2016in W PJcVjfllOmU C.M.No.18905/2016in W.P.(C) 4532/2016
C.M.No.18906/2016 in W.P.IC 4533/2016 ;The applications also standdisposedof
-sT,.
G.S.S1STAN1,J.
APRIL 18, 2017
■W.P.(C) 4010/2016~andothers
VINOD GOEL,J, 2017:DHC:8101-DB
JUDGMENT