Satpal v. Ranjeet Singh

Delhi High Court · 19 Apr 2017 · 2017:DHC:8904
Pratibha Rani
RC.REV. 143/2017
2017:DHC:8904
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed five revision petitions as infructuous following an amicable settlement reached by the parties before the Lok Adalat.

Full Text
Translation output
$9, 10, 48, 49 & 50 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RC.REV. 143/2017
SATPAL Petitioner
Through: Mr.Vishal Bedi, Advocate.
VERSUS
RANJEET SINGH (DECEASED)
THR HIS LR SHASHI Respondent
Through: Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate.
AND
RC.REV. 150/2017
BALRAJ Petitioner
VERSUS
RANJEET SINGH
(THR HIS LEGAL HEIRS SHASHI) Respondent AND
RC.REV. 145/2017
MANOJ Petitioner
VERSUS
O Through: Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate.
AND
RC.REV. 147/2017
SATISH Petitioner
VERSUS
RC.Rei'.Nos.143, 150, 145, 147& 149 of2017 Page/of 2
2017:DHC:8904 AND 5
RC.REV. 149/2017
MUKESH Petitioner
VERSUS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI npnvp 19.04.2017
CM No.12251/2017 in RC.Rev.No.143/2017 CM No. 12266/2017 in RC.Rev.No.150/2017
CM No.12253/2017 in RC.Rev.No. 145/2017 CM No. 12260/2017 in RC.Rev.No.147/2017
CM No.12263/2017 in RC.Rev.No. 149/2017 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Applications are disposed of.
RC.Rev.No. 143/2017 RC.Rev.No. 150/2017 RC.Rev.No. 145/2017
RC.Rev.No. 147/2017 RC.Rev.No. 149/2017 Learned counsel for the parties submit that since the parties have settled the dispute before the Lok Adalat on 8111 April, 2017, these revision petitions may be dismissed for having become infructuous.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the revision petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
P &T I B J iiGN3rJ APRIL 19, 2017/'st' RC. Rev. Nos. 143, /50, 145, 147 & 149 of2017
2017:DHC:8904
JUDGMENT