Rajbala v. Dena Bank & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 24 Apr 2017 · 2017:DHC:2146
Hima Kohli; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
W.P.(C) 3518/2017
2017:DHC:2146
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a DRT order for non-maintainability due to non-exhaustion of the statutory appellate remedy before the DRAT, allowing withdrawal with liberty to file appeal.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 3518/2017 & CMs 15365-66/2017
RAJBALA ..... Petitioner
Through : Mr. Sunil K. Jha with Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocates
VERSUS
DENA BANK & ORS ..... Respondents
Through : Mr. Karan Khanna with Ms. Asmita Kumar, Advocates for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL O R D E R
24.04.2017
JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 11.4.2017 passed by the DRT-I, Delhi in the present proceedings without approaching the DRAT by preferring an appeal.

2. The present petition has been listed subject to an office objection with regard to its maintainability.

3. Counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, while reserving the right of his client to file an appeal before the DRAT, as per law.

4. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending applications. HIMA KOHLI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J APRIL 24, 2017