Full Text
Translation output
$-39 & 40 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.REV.P. 684/2014 & CRL. M.A.I7566/2014
RAJENDER @ RAJU Petitioner
Through: Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv.
CRL.REV.P. 684/2014 & CRL. M.A.I7566/2014
RAJENDER @ RAJU Petitioner
Through: Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv.
VERSUS
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Respondent
Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP
Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP
CRL.REV.P. 685/2014 & CRL.M.A. 17594/2014
SANDEEP @ TINKU .... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv.
SANDEEP @ TINKU .... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE (NCT OFDELHI) Respondent
Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP
Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
24.04.2017 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw these petitions.
The revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
It has been submitted that one witness has been examined by the Trial
Court. The Trial Court is requested to expedite thetrial and conclude it positively within a period ofnine months from today.
A-a.L~Uit ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J APRIL 24, 2017 2017:DHC:8293
24.04.2017 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw these petitions.
The revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
It has been submitted that one witness has been examined by the Trial
Court. The Trial Court is requested to expedite thetrial and conclude it positively within a period ofnine months from today.
A-a.L~Uit ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J APRIL 24, 2017 2017:DHC:8293
JUDGMENT