RX TRADERS v. COMMISSIONER TRADE AND TAXES & ANR

Delhi High Court · 26 Apr 2017 · 2017:DHC:8157-DB
S. Muralidhar; Chander Shekhar
W.P.(C) 2774/2017 & W.P.(C) 2776/2017
2017:DHC:8157-DB
tax petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed petitioners to furnish form DVAT-21 for prompt disbursal of approved tax refund and interest, emphasizing mandatory procedural compliance under the DVAT Act.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 2774/2017
RX TRADERS Petitioner
Through: Mr. Arif Ahmed Khan with Mr. Gauri Grover, Advocates.
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER TRADE AND TAXES & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr. Satyakam, Additional Standing counsel along with Ms. Sakshi Baja, Mr. Narang, AVATO, in person.
And
W.P.(C) 2776/2017
RK TRADERS Petitioner
Through: Mr. Arif Ahmed Khan with Mr. Gauri Grover, Advocates.
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER TRADE AND TAXES & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr. Satyakam, Additional Standing counsel along with Ms. Sakshi Baja, Mr. Narang, AVATO, in person.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
26.04.2017
WP (C) 2774/2017 &WP (C) 2776/2017 Page I of2
2017:DHC:8157-DB CM APPL No. 12042/2017 (exemption) in WP (C) 2774/2017
CM APPL No. 12043/2017 (exemption) in WP (C) 2776/2017
ORDER

1. Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions. WP (C) 2774/2017 & WP (C) 2776/2017

2. Learned counsel for the Respondent produces a copy of the noting on file which shows that the Commissioner approved the disbursement of the refund together with interest owing to the Petitioner since first quarter of 2009-10 upto the fourth quarter of 2010-11. He states that the Petitioner will have to furnish necessary form in DVAT -21 to the VATO concerned forthwith for quick disbursal of the above amount.

3. In that view ofthe matter, the Court directs that the Petitioner will furnish, not later than three days from today, form DVAT-21 to the concerned VATO for payment ofthe refund amount and payment (plus interest) will be made to the Petitioner within one week thereafter.

4. The petitions are disposed of in the above terms. If there is any noncompliance with the above direction, it will be open to the Petitioner to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

S.MURALIDHAR, J CHANDER^EKHAR, J APRIL 26, IQlURm