Vishawjeet Sarkar & Ors. v. The State Govt. (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

Delhi High Court · 11 Jul 2025 · 2025:DHC:5494
Ravinder Dudeja
CRL.M.C. 1976/2025
2025:DHC:5494
criminal petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties, applying the principle that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process of law.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 1976/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 11.07.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, CRL.M.C. 1976/2025 & CRL.M.A. 8877/2025EXEMPTION
VISHAWJEET SARKAR & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Rajendra Singh, Adv. along
WITH
petitioner no.1 in person.
VERSUS
THE STATE GOVT. (NCT OF DELHI &
ANR) … Respondents
Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State
WITH
SI Dhiraj
Singh, PS-Shalimar Bagh.
Ms. Aastha Dhankar, Adv. for R2 through VC.
R2 in person.
CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.

1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0343/2015, dated 14.03.2015, registered at P.S Shalimar Bagh under sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.

2. The marriage between Petitioner No.1 and Respondent No.2 was solemnized on 09.07.2012 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. It is submitted that due to temperamental differences, the couple started living separately since 12.09.2014. Thereafter, Respondent No.2 lodged the aforesaid FIR against Petitioner No.1 and his family members. It is submitted that the parties are living together again as husband and wife since 2019. A girl child namely Priti Sarkar was born on 21.11.2019 out of the said wedlock.

3. During the proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and executed a Settlement Deed dated 14.01.2025. It is submitted that all the previous complaints and litigations initiated by the parties have been withdrawn. The copy of Settlement Deed dated 14.01.2025 has been placed on record as Annexure P-4.

4. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer.

5. Respondent No.2 confirms that the matter has been settled with the petitioners without any force, fear or coercion and they have been living together since 2019 without any complaint. The Respondent no.2 further submits that she has no objection if the FIR NO. 0343/2015 is quashed against the Petitioners.

6. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 0343/2015 is quashed.

7. In Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, Hon’ble Supreme Courthas recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-

"61. In other words, the High Court must consider whether it would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with the criminal proceedings or continuation of criminal proceedings would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and whether to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that criminal case is put to an end and if the answer to the above question(s) is in the affirmative, the High Court shall be well within its jurisdiction to quash the criminal proceedings."

8. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the fact that parties have put a quietus to the dispute, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the present FIR No. 0343/2015, dated 14.03.2015, registered at P.S Shalimar Bagh under sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom.

9. In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed, and FIR NO. 0343/2015, dated 14.03.2015, registered at P.S Shalimar Bagh under sections 498A/406/34 IPC and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed.

10. Petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

11. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

RAVINDER DUDEJA, J JULY 11, 2025/ AK