DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. GREEN FINANCE PVT. LTD.

Supreme Court of India · 20 Sep 2016
KURIAN JOSEPH; ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9422 OF 2016
property appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority’s appeals but granted one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.

Full Text
Translation output
Page 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9422 OF 2016
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 33354 OF 2015 ]
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Appellant(s)
VERSUS
GREEN FINANCE PVT. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9423 OF 2016
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 33634 OF 2015 ]
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9425 OF 2016
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 8815 OF 2016 ]
JUDGMENT
KURIAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgments in Civil Appeal No. 8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) NO. 8467 of 2015 and Civil Appeal No. 5811 of 2015 arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 21545 of 2015.

3. These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.

4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of these cases, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Page 2 Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh.

5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in possession, shall return the physical possession of the land to the original land owner. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. No costs ........................ J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] ....................... J. [ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ] New Delhi; September 20, 2016.