LNK Sangram Singh Yadav v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 15 Jul 2025 · 2025:DHC:5677-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul
W.P.(C) 5458/2025
2025:DHC:5677-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with the petitioner's posting but allowed him liberty to seek administrative reconsideration on grounds of family exigencies.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 5458/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 5458/2025, CM APPLs. 24904/2025 & 24905/2025
LNK SANGRAM SINGH YADAV .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Ms. Poonam Sharma, Mr. Kunal Tyagi and Mr. Harsh Tyagi, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Gopesh Jindal, Adv. for UOI
WITH
Major Anish Muralidhar (Army)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
ORDER (ORAL)
15.07.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT

1. Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has reported at his place of posting at Jodhpur. However, given his family exigencies, he prays that he may be granted liberty to approach the respondents to try and convince them to post him at a place where it could be more convenient.

2. We, accordingly, dispose of this writ petition without interfering with the posting presently granted to the petitioner. This shall, however, not inhibit the petitioner from moving an appropriate representation to the respondent seeking another posting. If any such representation is moved, it would be considered and decided on its W.P.(C) 5458/2025 own merit.

3. The writ petition is disposed of.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. JULY 15, 2025