Full Text
Translation output
Page 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12324 OF 2016
[@CIVIL APPEAL D. NO. 32409 OF 2016]
HARYANA VIDHYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD. Appellant(s)
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12324 OF 2016
[@CIVIL APPEAL D. NO. 32409 OF 2016]
HARYANA VIDHYUT PRASARAN NIGAM LTD. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
HARYANA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY
COMMISSION AND ANR. Respondent(s)
COMMISSION AND ANR. Respondent(s)
JUDGMENT
KURIAN, J.
1. Delay condoned.
2. It is seen that the APTEL has left the issue regarding impact on tariff under Section 63 of the Electricity Act, 2003 to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal.
3. We make it clear that the Tribunal will take an independent decision, uninfluenced by any of the observations and findings in the impugned Judgment.
4. The Arbitral Tribunal is directed to decide the impact on tariff as a preliminary issue.
5. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of. No costs ........................ J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] ....................... J. [ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ] New Delhi; December 14, 2016.