Mahendra Chandrahansa Satav v. Udyam Vikas Sahakari Bank Ltd

Supreme Court of India · 05 Dec 2016
Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11788-11789 OF 2016
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Supreme Court disposed of civil appeals by accepting the parties' settlement and modified the High Court's judgment accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
Page 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11788-11789 OF 2016
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 8486-8487 OF 2014 ]
MAHENDRA CHANDRAHANSA SATAV ETC.ETC. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
UDYAM VIKAS SAHAKARI BANK LTD & ORS ETC Respondent(s)
JUDGMENT
KURIAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. By agreement dated 27.10.2016, the parties have reached a settlement, settling their entire disputes. Those consent terms have been filed before this Court by way of I.A.Nos. 9-10 of 2016.

3. Therefore, these appeals are disposed of in terms of the consent terms. The impugned judgment of the High Court in the writ petitions shall stand modified in terms of the consent terms, referred to above.

4. In terms of the settlement, the amount lying in deposit in the Registry of this Court, along with accrued interest, shall be disbursed to Respondent No. 1-Bank. I.A.Nos. 9-10 of 2016 are disposed of. No costs ........................ J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] ....................... J. [ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ] New Delhi; December 05, 2016.