Government of NCT of Delhi v. Anup Singh

Supreme Court of India · 20 Apr 2017
Kurian Joseph; R. Banumathi
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5548 OF 2017
property appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the Government's appeals for failure to take possession or pay compensation within five years under Section 24(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory timelines.

Full Text
Translation output
Page 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5548 OF 2017
[ @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 38280 OF 2016 ]
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS SECRETARY
LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
ANUP SINGH AND ORS. Respondent(s)
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5549 OF 2017
[ @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 38289 OF 2016 ]
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5550 OF 2017
[ @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 38302 OF 2016 ]
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5551 OF 2017
[ @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 38362 OF 2016 ]
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5552 OF 2017
[ @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 38363 OF 2016 ]
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5553 OF 2017
[ @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 38365 OF 2016 ]
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5554 OF 2017
[ @ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 38372 OF 2016 ]
JUDGMENT
KURIAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. These are the cases of the original owners where neither possession has been taken nor compensation has been paid to the respondents.

3. It is also brought to the notice of the court that there was no stay operating, which prevented the Page 2 appellant(s) from taking possession or paying compensation to the respondents.

4. Neither having been done within five years, as contemplated under Section 24(2) of The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, we find no merit in these appeals, which are, accordingly, dismissed. No costs ........................ J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] ....................... J. [ R. BANUMATHI ] New Delhi; April 20, 2017.