Dhanesh Kumar v. Puniya Salila Srivastava

Delhi High Court · 31 Oct 2017 · 2017:DHC:8487
Manmohan J; A. K. Chawla J
CONT.CAS(C)762/2015
2017:DHC:8487
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt petitions after the respondent complied with pay scale upgrades and undertook to consider senior scale promotions, allowing petitioners to challenge unrelated administrative orders through proper legal channels.

Full Text
Translation output
6 to 8 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)762/2015
DHANESH KUMAR
(PHYSICALTRAININGINSTRUCTOR) Petitioner
Through;Mr.Saurabh Ahuja,Advocate.
VERSUS
' ■
PUNIYA SALILA SRIVASTAVA Respondent
Through:Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan,Advocate with Mr.Manzar Anis,Advocate.
WITH
CONT.CAS(C)770/2015 , PRAMANAND(LIBRARIAN) Petitioner
Through:Mr.Saurabh Ahuja,Advocate.
VERSUS
PUNIYASALILA SRIVASTAVA Respondent
Through:Mr.'Naushad Ahmed Khan,Advocate ' - 'with Mr.Manzar Anis,Advocate.
AND
. CONT.CAS(C)771/2015 SURESHCHAND VASHISTH(LIBRARIAN) Petitioner
Through:Mr.Saurabh Ahuja,Advocate.
VERSUS
2017:DHC:8487 PUNIYA SALILAsfeASTAVA , Respondent
,. Through:Mr.lUzwan,Advocatefor Mr.Santosh K.Tripathi,Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN ^ ORDER o/o 05.05.2017
Today,learned counselforrespondenthashanded over an affidavitin
Cont.Cas(C) 771/2015 in which it is stated that petitioners have been granted upgraded pay scale of Rs.8,000-275-13,500 at entry level in pursuance to the suitable assessment conveyed; vide letter dated 29^''
December,2016issued by UnionPublic Service Commission.
Learned courisel for.respondent assures this Courtthatthe suitability of the petitioners for senior scale shall be considered by the Selection
Committee in accordance withAICTE letter dated 27^^ August,2014 within aperiod offour weeks.
The statement made by learned counsel for respondentis accepted by this Courtand respondentis held bound bythe same.
Recording such undertaking, the present contempt petitions are disposed ofand the noticesissued are discharged.
Letacompliance affidavitbefiled within aperiod ofsix weeks.
Listthe mattersforcompliance on 16^^ August,2017.
MANMOHAN,J MAY 05,2017 js . '' .
1$ $-37 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CONT.CAS(C)770/2015
PRAMANAND(LIBRARIAN) , . Petitioner
Through . Mr.Sourabh Ahuja,Advocate
VERSUS
PUNIYA SALILA SRIVASTAVA Respondent
Through Mr.Naushad Ahmed Khan,ASCfor GNCTD.
CORAM:
► HON'BLEMR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA
31.10.2017 In view- of the affidavit dated 26.10.2017 filed by the respondent-GNCTD, Id. Counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition, with the liberty to have lawful recourse to assail orders dated 22.8.2014 and 16.10.2017 inasmuch as any challenge or the legal recourse against the said order/circular, does not fall within the domain of the instantproceedings. .Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed, as may be available under law
I ir- .
A.K. CHAWLA, J OCTOBER 31,2017 rc
JUDGMENT