Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax (Central)-1 v. Ranjana Garg

Delhi High Court · 01 May 2017 · 2017:DHC:8758-DB
S. Muralidhar; Chander Shekhar
ITA 257/2017
2017:DHC:8758-DB
tax appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals against ITAT orders for AY 2006-07, holding the issue was covered by the binding precedent in CIT v. Kabul Chawla.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ITA 257/2017
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL)- 1
Appellant
Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Mr. Dileep Shivpuri & Mr. Vikrant A.
Maheshwari, Advocates
VERSUS
RANJANA GARG, Through:
WITH
Respondent Mr. Shashwat Bajpai & Mr. Sharad Agarwal, Advocates
258/2017 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (CENTRAL)-1
Appellant
Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Mr. Dileep Shivpuri & Mr. Vikrant A.
Maheshwari, Advocates
VERSUS
RANJANA GARG, Through:
Respondent Mr. Shashwat Bajpai & Mr. Sharad Agarwal, Advocates
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
01.05.2017 CM No.12302/2017 in ITA No.258/2017
2017:DHC:8758-DB (S)
ORDER

1. Allowed, subject to alljust exceptions. ITA Nos.257/2017 and 258/2017

2. The question raised in these appeals by the Revenue against the order dated 19^^ October, 2016 in ITA No.2083/Del/2012 and ITA No.2833/Del/2012 of the Income Tax Appellate' Tribunal for Assessment Year 2006-07 stands covered against it by the decision of this Court in CIT

V. Kabul Chawla 380ITR 573.

3. The appeals are dismissed.

S.MURALIDHAR, J CHANl^^HEKHAR,J