Raj Kumar Jain v. State & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 11 May 2017 · 2017:DHC:8180
R. K. Gauba
W.P.(CRL) 1739/2016 & 1740/2016
2017:DHC:8180
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of criminal writ petitions with liberty to raise all contentions before the trial court at the charge consideration stage.

Full Text
Translation output
$-25 & 26 HIGH COURT OF DELHI W.P.(CRL) 1739/20 16 and Cr!. M.A. 9073/20 16
RAJ KUMAR JAIN Petitioner
Through: Mr. Raj iv Mohan and Mr. Ambar Tewari, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE & ANR. Respondents
Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Insp. Manish Joshi and SI Anshul Kumar, PS
Madhu Vihar W.P.(CRL) 1740/20 16 and Cr!. M.A. 9074/20 16
RAJ KUMAR JAIN Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajiv Mohan and Mr. Ambar Tewari, Advocates
VERSUS
STATE & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Insp. Manish Joshi and SI Anshul Kumar, PS
Madhu Vihar
CORAM:
HONtBLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
11.05.2017 After some hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw these
W.P.(CRL) 1739/2016& 1740/2016 page! of2
2017:DHC:8180 I petitions with liberty to urge and raise all the contentions made herein before the trial court at the stage of consideration of charge, in the event of cognizance being taken and he being summoned in the proceedings arising out of FIR 751/2015 of police station Madhu
Vihar and FIR 508/2015 of police station Madhu Vihar respectively.
The petitions and the accompanying applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
R.K.G UB ,J MAY 11, 2017 Yg
W.P.(CRL) 1739/2016& 1740/2016 page2of2
Or 2017:DHC:8180
JUDGMENT