Rajiv Gupta v. Inderpal Singh; Rajiv Gupta v. Kartar Singh

Delhi High Court · 26 May 2017 · 2017:DHC:8905
Pratibha Rani
RC.REV.76/2017; RC.REV.84/2017
2017:DHC:8905
procedural appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw two revision petitions due to procedural mix-up, granting liberty to file fresh petitions.

Full Text
Translation output
$-44&45 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RC.REV.76/2017
RAJIV GUPTA Petitioner
Through: Ms.Ira Gupta,Advocate
VERSUS
INDERPAL SINGH& ANR Respondents
Through: Mr.Amit Gupta,Advocate AND
RC.REV.84/2017
RAJIV GUPTA Petitioner
Through: Ms.Ira Gupta,Advocate
VERSUS
KARTAR SINGH & ANR Respondents
Through: Mr.Vipin K.Saini,Advocate for R-I Mr.Amit Gupta,Adv.for R-2& R-3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
26.05.2017 CM No.6459/2017 in RC.REV.76/2017 CM No.6970/2017 in RC.REV.84/2017
Exemption allowed,subjectto alljust exceptions.
Applications stand disposed of.
RC.REV.76/2017& CM No.20579/20I7
RC.REV.84/2017& CM No.20580/2017
I. By way offiling ofCM Nos.20579/2017 & 20580/2017,petitioner is seeking permission to withdraw these revision petitions with liberty to file afresh petitions on the ground that papers ofboth the revision petitions got
RC.REV.Nos.76/2017& 84/2017 Page 1 of2 2017:DHC:8905 mixed up.
ORDER

2. Notice. Counsel as above accepts notice of these applications and submits that they have no objection if the petitions are allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.

3. In view ofthe above, these applications are allowed and both these revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn granting the liberty as prayed for. CM No.6458/2017 in RC.REV.76/2017 CM No.6969/2017 in RC.REV.84/2017 Dismissed as infructuous.