Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Inter Globe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court · 30 May 2017 · 2017:DHC:8763-DB
S. Muralidhar; Chander Shekhar
ITA 345/2017
2017:DHC:8763-DB
tax appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals against the ITAT order for AY 2007-08 to 2010-11, condoning delay and affirming the binding effect of its earlier decision in favor of the Assessee.

Full Text
Translation output
<D $-1,2,9 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ITA 345/2017
THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia & Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocates
VERSUS
INTER GLOBE TECHNOLOGY QUOTIENT PVT. LTD.
Respondent
Through: Mr. Aditya Vohra, Advocates
WITH
ITA 346/2017
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia &Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocates
VERSUS
WITH
.
ITA 355/2017
THE PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 Appellant
Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia & Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocates
VERSUS
ITA NO.34S/2017&connectedmatters pgg^ j qJ2 2017:DHC:8763-DB
CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
30.05.2017 CM No. 16881/2017 in ITA No. 345/2017 & CM No. 16897/2017 in ITA
No. 355/2017 1.Allowed, subjectto alljust exceptions.
CM No. 16882/2017 in ITA No. 345/2017. CM No. 16883/2017 in ITA
No. 346/2017 & CM No. 16898/2017 in ITA No. 355/2017
ORDER

2. For the reasons stated therein, the applications are allowed. Delay of 38 days in re-filingthe appeals is condoned. ITA Nos. 344/2017. 345/2017 & 355/2017

3. These are three appeals by the Revenue against a common order dated 26'^' July, 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA Nos. 419/Del/2011 for the Assessment Year ('AY') 2007-08, 5830/Del/2011 for AY 2008-09, ITA No. 1463/Del/2013 for AY 2009-10 and 6144/Del/2013 for AY 2010-11.

4. The question raised by the Revenue in these appeals stands answered against the Revenue and in favour of the Assessee by a decision of this Court dated 22"'' May, 2017 in ITA No. 330/2017 titled Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. Inter Globe Technology Quotient Pvt. Ltd.

5. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.