Full Text
Translation output
'S~ $ 1/2 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 238/2017
SHAHID & ORS Petitioners
Through Mr. Tanveer Ahmed, Adv.
CRL.M.C. 238/2017
SHAHID & ORS Petitioners
Through Mr. Tanveer Ahmed, Adv.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents
Through : Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Rajiv Kumar, P.S. Welcome for respondent no. 1
Respondent no. 2 in person.
Through : Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Rajiv Kumar, P.S. Welcome for respondent no. 1
Respondent no. 2 in person.
AND
CRL.M.C. 242/2017
JAFRUDDIN & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through : Kapil Singhal, Adv.
JAFRUDDIN & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through : Kapil Singhal, Adv.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & Ors. .....Respondents
Through Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Rajiv Kumar, P.S. Welcome for respondent no. 1
Respondent nos. 2 to 4 in person.
Through Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP with SI Rajiv Kumar, P.S. Welcome for respondent no. 1
Respondent nos. 2 to 4 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
04.07.2017 F Shahid (respondent no. 2) is complainant in Cr!. M.C. No. 242/2017, whereby it has been prayed that FIR No. 211/2012 under Sections
323/341/427/34 IPC registered at Police Station Welcome Colony, Delhi on the complaint of Shahid may be quashed, in view of the settlement arrived at
2017:DHC:8045 with the accused, that is, petitioners. Respondent no. 3 Firoz and respondent no. 4 Raheesa are injured persons in the aforesaid FIR.
Vide Cr1. M.C. No. 238/2017, it has been prayed that FIR NO. 210/2012 under Sections 323/324/427/34 IPC registered at Police Station
Welcome Colony, Delhi on the complaint of Naushad, may be quashed, in
'1 view of the settlement arrived at with the accused persons, that is, petitioners in the said case.
Both the FIRs are cross FIRs. Shahid and Raheesa are related to each other and are neighbours of Naushad. Naushad, Shahid, Firoz and Raheesa are present in Court and submit that they have settled their disputes on their own free will and without any undue force, coercion and pressure. They further submit that they are not willing to pursue their respective FIRs any further and the same may be quashed.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the parties voluntarily, both the above-mentioned FIRs and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Both the petitions are disposed of in the above te s.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JULY 04, 2017 2017:DHC:8045
04.07.2017 F Shahid (respondent no. 2) is complainant in Cr!. M.C. No. 242/2017, whereby it has been prayed that FIR No. 211/2012 under Sections
323/341/427/34 IPC registered at Police Station Welcome Colony, Delhi on the complaint of Shahid may be quashed, in view of the settlement arrived at
2017:DHC:8045 with the accused, that is, petitioners. Respondent no. 3 Firoz and respondent no. 4 Raheesa are injured persons in the aforesaid FIR.
Vide Cr1. M.C. No. 238/2017, it has been prayed that FIR NO. 210/2012 under Sections 323/324/427/34 IPC registered at Police Station
Welcome Colony, Delhi on the complaint of Naushad, may be quashed, in
'1 view of the settlement arrived at with the accused persons, that is, petitioners in the said case.
Both the FIRs are cross FIRs. Shahid and Raheesa are related to each other and are neighbours of Naushad. Naushad, Shahid, Firoz and Raheesa are present in Court and submit that they have settled their disputes on their own free will and without any undue force, coercion and pressure. They further submit that they are not willing to pursue their respective FIRs any further and the same may be quashed.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the parties voluntarily, both the above-mentioned FIRs and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Both the petitions are disposed of in the above te s.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
JULY 04, 2017 2017:DHC:8045
JUDGMENT