S.E.INVESTMENTS LTD. v. BARTRONICS INDIA LIMITED & ANR.

Delhi High Court · 05 Jul 2017 · 2017:DHC:3293
Sanjeev Sachdeva
EX. P.369 /2015
2017:DHC:3293
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The court held that under the pre-2015 Arbitration Act, a pending Section 34 challenge stays enforcement of an arbitral award and allowed withdrawal of the execution petition with liberty to refile.

Full Text
Translation output
EX. P.369 /2015
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 05.07.2017
EX.P.369 /2015
S.E.INVESTMENTS LTD. ..... Decree Holder
versus
BARTRONICS INDIA LIMITED & ANR. ..... Judgment Debtor
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Decree Holder : Mr Nagesh Puthige For the Judgment Debtors : Mr Sudipto Sircar and Mr A.D.N.Rao
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Learned counsel for the parties inform that the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, as it stood prior to the amendment by the Arbitration & Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, is applicable to the present proceedings.

2. Learned counsel for the parties further inform that Section 34 application under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 impugning the award/decree dated 12.07.2014 passed by the Sole Arbitrator is pending. 2017:DHC:3293 EX. P.369 /2015

3. In view of the un-amended Section 34, a challenge under Section 34 of the Act amounts to a stay of the enforcement of the award.

4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the decree holder seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in case the Section 34 application impugning the award dated 12.07.2014 is decided in favour of the decree holder.

5. The Execution Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the decree holder, as prayed for.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J JULY 05, 2017 ‘Sn’