Full Text
Translation output
$48.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C.R.P. No.149/2017 NARENDER YADAV (THR HIS LRS) . .. Petitioner
Through: Mr. Arun Sharma and Mr. Sidharth Sejwal, Advs.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
C.R.P. No.149/2017 NARENDER YADAV (THR HIS LRS) . .. Petitioner
Through: Mr. Arun Sharma and Mr. Sidharth Sejwal, Advs.
VERSUS
RAJENDER KUMAR SHARMA & ANR .....Respondents
Through: None.
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
11.07.2017 This petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
(CPC) impugns the order dated 15th February, 2017 of the Additional Rent
Controller of deferring the passing of the order under Section 15(1) of the
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Attention of the counsel for the petitioner has been drawn to Section
38 of the said Act which provides for an appeal from every order of the
Controller to the Rent Control Tribunal and it has been enquired from the counsel for the petitioner as to why the said provision is not applicable.
Even otherwise the question of invoking Section 115 of the CPC does not arise.
A 4. The counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail of appropriate remedy.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty to prefer appropriate remedy is granted subject to deposit of costs of Rs.5,000/- with the Delhi High Court Bar Association
C.R.P. No.149/2017 2017:DHC:8800 V Lawyers' Social Security and Welfare Fund, New Delhi. The petitioner, before preferring the alternative remedy, shall show to the Court concerned the proof of deposit of such co
JULY 119 2017 'pp' C.R.P. No.149/2017 ENDLAW, J page2 of 2
2017:DHC:8800
11.07.2017 This petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
(CPC) impugns the order dated 15th February, 2017 of the Additional Rent
Controller of deferring the passing of the order under Section 15(1) of the
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Attention of the counsel for the petitioner has been drawn to Section
38 of the said Act which provides for an appeal from every order of the
Controller to the Rent Control Tribunal and it has been enquired from the counsel for the petitioner as to why the said provision is not applicable.
Even otherwise the question of invoking Section 115 of the CPC does not arise.
A 4. The counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to avail of appropriate remedy.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty to prefer appropriate remedy is granted subject to deposit of costs of Rs.5,000/- with the Delhi High Court Bar Association
C.R.P. No.149/2017 2017:DHC:8800 V Lawyers' Social Security and Welfare Fund, New Delhi. The petitioner, before preferring the alternative remedy, shall show to the Court concerned the proof of deposit of such co
JULY 119 2017 'pp' C.R.P. No.149/2017 ENDLAW, J page2 of 2
2017:DHC:8800
JUDGMENT