Full Text
Translation output
J \ ..
$-A1 HIGH COURT OF DELHI . . .
ITA 494/2017
PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-VI, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Arun Khatri, Advocate.
$-A1 HIGH COURT OF DELHI . . .
ITA 494/2017
PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-VI, NEW DELHI ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Arun Khatri, Advocate.
VERSUS
NEC TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent
Through: None. e , CORAM: JUSTICES.MURALIDHAR
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
010 11.07.2017 CM APPL. No. 23939/2017 (delay in filing) fl"
Through: None. e , CORAM: JUSTICES.MURALIDHAR
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
010 11.07.2017 CM APPL. No. 23939/2017 (delay in filing) fl"
ORDER
1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing this appeal is condoned. This application is~ accordingly, disposed of. ITA 494/2017
2. It is stated by learned counsel for the.Petitioner that th~ question urged in the present case stands covered against the Revenue by the decision dated 2th January, 2017 in the batch matters of ITA Nos. 46/2017 (Pr. Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Central)-III, New Delhi v. Parnod Ricard India Pvt. Ltd.)
3. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J P~k.t-\~~)- PRATHIBA M. SINdk, J JULY 11, 2017