Full Text
Translation output
$-19-23 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.REV.P.246/2016'
RAHUL KATYAL Petitioner
Through:Mr.Rajiv Mohan and Ms.Priyanka Singh,Advocates.
CRL.REV.P.246/2016'
RAHUL KATYAL Petitioner
Through:Mr.Rajiv Mohan and Ms.Priyanka Singh,Advocates.
VERSUS
STATE - Respondent
Through:MrArun Kr.Sharma,APP -vY Mr.Hrishikesh Barhah with Mr.Arjun
Dewan and Ms.Anupama Kumar,Adv.for complainant.
Through:MrArun Kr.Sharma,APP -vY Mr.Hrishikesh Barhah with Mr.Arjun
Dewan and Ms.Anupama Kumar,Adv.for complainant.
CRL.REV.P.247/2016 &Crl.M,A:No:5125/2016 .
REENA KATYAL Petitioner
REENA KATYAL Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE ' Respondent.
Through:Mr.Arun Kr.Sharma,APP. Mr.Hrishikesh Bamah with Mr.Arjun
Dewan and Ms,Anupama Kumar,Adv.for ,CRL.REV.P.248/2016& Crl.M.A.No.5138.& 5171/2016 n
SATNAM SINGH SODHI Petitioner versus.
STATE ..... Respondent
Through:Mr.Arun Kr.Sharma,APP Mr.Hrishikesh Bamah with Mr.Arjun
2017:DHC:8299 Dewan and Ms.Anupama Kumar,Adv.for complainant. .
Through:Mr.Arun Kr.Sharma,APP. Mr.Hrishikesh Bamah with Mr.Arjun
Dewan and Ms,Anupama Kumar,Adv.for ,CRL.REV.P.248/2016& Crl.M.A.No.5138.& 5171/2016 n
SATNAM SINGH SODHI Petitioner versus.
STATE ..... Respondent
Through:Mr.Arun Kr.Sharma,APP Mr.Hrishikesh Bamah with Mr.Arjun
2017:DHC:8299 Dewan and Ms.Anupama Kumar,Adv.for complainant. .
CRL.REV.P.249/2016:& Crl.M.A.Nos.5140,5172/2016
AMRINDER SESfGH SODHl Petitioner
Through: Mr.H.R.Suhail Khan with Mr.Samar Khan and Mr.Amit Mishra,Adv.
AMRINDER SESfGH SODHl Petitioner
Through: Mr.H.R.Suhail Khan with Mr.Samar Khan and Mr.Amit Mishra,Adv.
VERSUS
STATE Respondent Mr.Hrishikesh Bamah with Mr.Aijun
Dewah and Ms.Anupama Kumar,Adv.for
Dewah and Ms.Anupama Kumar,Adv.for
CRL.REV.P.250/2016& Crl:M.A.Nos.5145,5147/2016
ASHASODHI .....Petitioner
Through:Mr.Aditya Shankar with Mr.Sameer Kumar
ASHASODHI .....Petitioner
Through:Mr.Aditya Shankar with Mr.Sameer Kumar
VERSUS
STATE ' Respondent Mr.Hrishikesh Bamah with Mr.Arjun
' , Dewan and Ms.Anupama Kumar,Adv.for
' , Dewan and Ms.Anupama Kumar,Adv.for
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR O R D E R 18.07.2017
Teamed counsels for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the aforesaid revision petitions in orderto contestthe case atthe trial.
The aforesaid revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
It would be open for the petitioners to agitate all the issues which have been raised here, at the trial, which shall be decided by the trial Court on its own merits and without being prejudiced by the fact that the present petitions have been dismissed.
ASHUTOSH KUMAR,J JULY 18,2017 Bisht w''
Teamed counsels for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the aforesaid revision petitions in orderto contestthe case atthe trial.
The aforesaid revision petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
It would be open for the petitioners to agitate all the issues which have been raised here, at the trial, which shall be decided by the trial Court on its own merits and without being prejudiced by the fact that the present petitions have been dismissed.
ASHUTOSH KUMAR,J JULY 18,2017 Bisht w''
JUDGMENT