Sanjay Goel v. M/S D N Jewels

Delhi High Court · 20 Jul 2017 · 2017:DHC:8014
A.K. Pathak; A.K.K.
CRL.M.C. 893/2016
2017:DHC:8014
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed petitions to delete the petitioner’s name from cheque dishonor complaint cases after the complainant stated it would not press charges against him as he was not a Director at the relevant time.

Full Text
Translation output
$201 21 and 22 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 893/2016 and CRL.M.A. 3743/20 16
SANJAY GOEL
Petitioner
Through Mr. Anil Goel, Advocate
VERSUS
M/S D N JEWELS It .....Respondent
Through Counsel for the respondent (appearance not given)
CRL.M.C. 1258/2016 and CRL.M.A. 5423/20 16
SANJAY GOEL.....Petitioner
VERSUS
M/S D N JEWELS.....Respondent
CRL.M.C. 1259/2016 and CRL.M.A. 5425/2016
SANJAY GOEL.....Petitioner
VERSUS
M/S DN JEWELS Respondent (4 2017:DHC:8014 -T
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
20.07.2017 Learned counsel for respondent submits that respondent has already made a statement before the Trial Court that complaint will not be pressed against the petitioner. It is submitted that proceedings against the petitioner have not been dropped by the Trial Court because of the pendency of the present petition. Counsel for the respondent submits that the complaint cases pending before the trial court are not pressed against the petitioner since he was not a Director as on the date of the presentation of the cheque. Accordingly, petitioner's name shall stand deleted from the array of parties in the complaint cases.
Petitions are disposed of in the above terms.
A.K.K, J JULY 209 2017 gb p 2017:DHC:8014
JUDGMENT