VIPIN & ORS. v. STATE & ANR.

Delhi High Court · 17 Jul 2017 · 2017:DHC:8013
A. K. Pathak
CRL.M.C. 1602/2016
2017:DHC:8013
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed two cross FIRs arising from a trivial quarrel after the parties amicably settled the dispute without coercion, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

Full Text
Translation output
r $-8 and 17 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 1602/2016
VIPIN & ORS.
Petitioner
Through Mr. Akshya Kumar Sharma, Monika Sharma, Mr. Desh Raj and Mr. Devender Kumar,Advocates
VERSUS
STATE& ANR.
Respondents
Through Mr.Amit Gupta,Advocate with SI S. K.Singh
CRL.M.C. 1263/2016
INDRAJ & ORS Petitioner
Through Mr. Desh Raj and Mr. Devender Kumar,Advocates
VERSUS
THE STATE GOVT OF NOT OF DELHI& ORS Respondents
Through Mr.Amit Gupta,Advocate with S.K.
Singh for State Mr.Akshya Kumar Sharma,Monika
Sharma,Advocates for R-2to R-7
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.K.PATHAK
17.07.2017 By these petitions, petitioners (accused persons) and private respondents(complainants/ victims)have prayed for quashing ofthe
2017:DHC:8013 p.: following two cross FIRs. a) FIR No. 395/2014, under Section 323/308/452/34 IPC registered at PS Fatehpur Beri, Delhi on the complainant of
Hemraj(respondent no.2)in Criminal MC No.1602/2016. b) FIR no. 396/2014, under section 308/325/452/506/34 IPC registered at PS Fatehpur Beri, Delhi on the complaint of Sanjay
(respondent no.2)in Crl. M.C.No. 1263/2016.
Accused persons and complainants in both the FIRs are related to
^ each other. A quarreltook place between them wherein both the sides sustained injuries. With the intervention oftheir common friends and other family members petitioners and private respondents have settled their disputes amicably. Complainants/ victims(private respondents) in both the oases, are present in Court and have been identified by SI
S. K. Singh of Police Station Fatehpur Beri. They submit that they have settled the matter in order to maintain harmonious relations in future. They have settled the matter without any undue force pressure
^ or coercion and are not willing to pursue the aforesaid FIRs any further,therefore,the same may be quashed.
Keeping in mind that a quarrel took place between the parties on some trivial matter and that the matter has been settled between them, in the interest of Justice, both the above referred FIRs and consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed.
Petitions are disposed ofin the above terms.
(M—
A.K.PATHAK,J JULY 17,2017 gb 2017:DHC:8013
JUDGMENT