Ajay Sfiarjva v. State & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 26 Jul 2017 · 2017:DHC:8055
A.K. Pathak
CRL.M.C. 4801/2016
2017:DHC:8055
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's voluntary withdrawal at the investigation stage.

Full Text
Translation output
I
+
$-12/45
*
IN THE HIGH• COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 4801/2016
AJAY SFIARJ\4A
Petitioner
Through Mr. B.R. Kaushik, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR.
Respondents
Through :Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP with
Inspector Shankar La!, P.S. Najafgarh for the State
Respondent no. 2 in person.
CRL.M.C. 2869/2017 & CRL.M.A. ! 1897/20 17
KULBHIJS}-JAN SHARMA & ORS
Petitioners
Through Mr. B.R. Kaushik, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR.
Respondents
Through :Mr. G.M. Farooqui , APP with
Inspector Shankar Lal, P.S. Najaf
Garh for the State
CORAM:
Respondent no. 2 in person.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
26.07.2017
It is submitted that petitioners and respondent no. 2, namely, Rajbir
2017:DHC:8055
'iv
Sharma have settled their disputçs amicably, therefore, FIR No. 61
8/2015 under Sections 419/420/467/468/469/471/120B IPC registered at Police
Station Nagaf Garh on the complaint of respondent no. 2, may be quashed.
Affidavit of the respondent no. 2 is on record in both the matters.
Respondent no. 2 is present in Court and has been identified by Inspector
I
Shankar Lal, P.S. Najaf Garh. Respondent no. 2 submits that he has settled the matter with the petitioners of his own free will and without any undue force, pressure or coercion and that he is not willing to pursue the FIR any further in view of the settlement arrived at between him and the petitioners.
Keeping in mind the fact that settlement has been arrived at between the petitioners and respondent no. 2, inasmuch as, respondent no.2 is not interested in pursuing the FIR any further, in the interest of justice, FIR NO. 618/2015 under Sections 419/420/467/468/469/471/120B IPC registered at
Police Station NajafGarh, which is at the investigation stage, is quashed.
Both the above petitions are disposed of in the above terms.
Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.
JULY 269 2017
A.K. è%ThAK, J. rb
2017:DHC:8055
JUDGMENT