Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Rekha & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 03 Aug 2017 · 2017:DHC:4208
R. K. Gauba
MAC Appeal No.98/2017
2017:DHC:4208
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal and remitted the motor accident claim back to the Tribunal for further inquiry to allow production of eyewitness evidence and fresh adjudication on negligence and liability.

Full Text
Translation output
MAC Appeal No.98/2017 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 03rd August, 2017
MAC.APP. 98/2017 and CM 3363/2017
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.A.K. Soni, Advocate
VERSUS
REKHA & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.A.N. Aggarwal, Adv. for R-1 to 4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)

1. The accident claim case (MACP 1515/16) instituted by first to fourth respondents has been decided by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, by judgment dated 15.11.2016, awarding compensation in their favour on account of death of Shrikant in a motor vehicular accident that allegedly took place on the night of 16 / 17.09.2010 statedly due to negligent driving of a motor vehicle bearing no.DL-1E-

1673.

2. The insurance company on which the liability to pay the compensation has been fastened is in appeal raising several contentions including the prime one that involvement of the offending vehicle and negligence on the part of its driver was not proved. 2017:DHC:4208 MAC Appeal No.98/2017

3. The learned counsel for the claimants concedes that eye witness account was available and the same has not been brought before the Tribunal. He, therefore, fairly conceded that the appeal may be allowed and the matter remitted to the tribunal for further inquiry.

4. The impugned judgment is set aside. The claim case is remitted to the tribunal for further inquiry in which the claimants will be given opportunity to lead further evidence to prove the involvement and negligence on the part of the driver of the above mentioned vehicle. If so required, having regard to the other contentions urged in the appeal, claimants will also have the liberty to lead further evidence on other aspects as well. Needless to add, the tribunal will give an opportunity to the contesting parties to lead evidence in rebuttal, if any, before taking a fresh decision.

5. The parties are directed to appear before the tribunal on 04.09.2017.

6. The insurance company had deposited the awarded amount with interest in terms of order dated 27.01.2017. The said amount shall be presently refunded.

7. The statutory amount shall also be refunded.

8. The appeal and the pending application are disposed of in above terms. R.K.GAUBA, J. AUGUST 03, 2017 yg