Full Text
Translation output
$-50 , HIGH COURT OF DELHI ,+ W.P.(C) 6697/2017
: JITENDER SINGH . Petitioner
Through: Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aviral Dhirendra, Advocate
: JITENDER SINGH . Petitioner
Through: Mr. Narender Hooda, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aviral Dhirendra, Advocate
VERSUS
UQI AND ORS
Through; ..... Respondents Ms. Sangita Rai, CGSG, for R-1
Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr. Devik Singh and Mr. Omung Gupta, Advocates for R-2
Through; ..... Respondents Ms. Sangita Rai, CGSG, for R-1
Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Mr. Devik Singh and Mr. Omung Gupta, Advocates for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
04.08.2017 CM APPL.27882-27883/2017 (Exemption)
Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Applications stand disposed of
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
04.08.2017 CM APPL.27882-27883/2017 (Exemption)
Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Applications stand disposed of
W.P.(C) 6697/2017
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner shall implead the affected Indian Revenue Service (IRS) (IT)
Officers in representative capacity through the Department since there are hundreds of Officers who would be affected. The purpose of impleadmeiit of the affected Officers is to ensure that their views are also placed before
2017:DHC:8260-DB r the Central Administrative Tribunal ('Tribunal') and they are heard on their submissions. Considering the fact that there are hundreds ofsuch IRS (IT)
Officers who may be affected, and it is not possible to implead each one of them in disputes like the present one, we permit the petitioner to implead any eight (08) ofthe affected IRS (IT) Officers in representative capacity.
It shall also be open to the respondent-Ministry of Personnel, Public
Grievances and Pensions to issue appropriate circulars so as to inform all the affected IRS (IT) Officers about the claim staked by the petitioner so that they can,also be represented before the Tribunal, ifthey wish to.
In view of the aforesaid, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for reconsideration after the petitioner has taken requisite steps in the aforesaid terms.
VIPIN SANGHI, J REKHA ALLI, J AUGUST 04, 2017 nn
2017:DHC:8260-DB
After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner shall implead the affected Indian Revenue Service (IRS) (IT)
Officers in representative capacity through the Department since there are hundreds of Officers who would be affected. The purpose of impleadmeiit of the affected Officers is to ensure that their views are also placed before
2017:DHC:8260-DB r the Central Administrative Tribunal ('Tribunal') and they are heard on their submissions. Considering the fact that there are hundreds ofsuch IRS (IT)
Officers who may be affected, and it is not possible to implead each one of them in disputes like the present one, we permit the petitioner to implead any eight (08) ofthe affected IRS (IT) Officers in representative capacity.
It shall also be open to the respondent-Ministry of Personnel, Public
Grievances and Pensions to issue appropriate circulars so as to inform all the affected IRS (IT) Officers about the claim staked by the petitioner so that they can,also be represented before the Tribunal, ifthey wish to.
In view of the aforesaid, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Tribunal for reconsideration after the petitioner has taken requisite steps in the aforesaid terms.
VIPIN SANGHI, J REKHA ALLI, J AUGUST 04, 2017 nn
2017:DHC:8260-DB
JUDGMENT