Full Text
/>b- 'T? $-54 to 66 (Except Item 61)
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 4244/2015 and CM No. 7683/2015
RK TOURS AND TRAVELS Petitioner
Through: Mr Romy Chacko, Advocate.
Through: Mr Kirtiman Singh, Mr Prateek Dhanda, Mr Waize AH Noor, Advocates ith Mr Cecil Luthur, Protector General ofEmigrants
(PGE).
Mr Rahul Sharma and Mr C.K. Bhatt, Advocate for R-2/GNCTD.
M/S SONIA INTERNATIONAL • Petitioner
Through: Mr Romy Chacko, Advocate.
Through: Mr Kirtiman Singh, Mr Prateek Dhanda, Mr Waize Ali Noor, Advocates ith Mr Cecil Luthur, Protector General ofEmigrants
(PGE).
19775/2015 ABDUL NAZAR Petitioner
Through: Mr Subhash Chandran K.R., Advocate.
Through: Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr S.S. Rai, Advocate.
ASSOCIATION OF OVERSEAS RECRUITING AGENTS & ANR
Through:
D. Sarkar, Advocates.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSCwith Mr S.S. Rai, Advocate.
M/S HIBA EXPORTS INDIA Petitioner
Through: Mr Harshad V. Hameed, Mr Dileep Poolakkot and Mrs Ashly Harshad, Advocates.
Through:
Through:
Respondents Mr Jaswinder Singh and Mr Santosh
Pandey, Advocates.
Mr Vikas Mahajan, CGSC with Mr Brajesh Kumar and Mr S.S. Rai,
Through: Mr Harshad V. Hameed, Mr Dileep Poolakkot and Mrs Ashly Harshad, Respondents
Mr Jaswinder Singh and Mr Santosh Pandey, Advocates.
M/S DIVE HR CONSULTANCEY TRAVEL & TRADE LINKS Petitioner
Through: Mr Joseph Koshy, Ms Sheetal
UNITED NURSES ASSOCIATION & ANR Petitioners Advocate.
Tlirough: Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC/UOI.
Mr G. Prakash, Standing Counsel with Mr Jishnu M.L., Advocate for R-
5 (State ofKerala).
MATHEW ASSOCIATES Petitioner
Through: Mr Ram Gupta, Advocate.
Through: Mr Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms Seerat Singh, Advocate for UOI.
M/S GUDNET COMPUTERS PVT. LTD. Petitioner
Through: Mr Joseph Koshy, Ms Sheetal
M/S CHARTERED AIR TRAVELS Petitioner Tlirough: Mr Subhash Chandran K.R., Advocate.
Through AND
M/S SKY LINK AIR TRAVELS Petitioner Advocate.
Through: Ms Anjana Gosain and Ms Rubiya Thakur, Advocates for R-1 to 3.
Mr Rajesh Gogna, CGSC for Respondent.
10.08.2017 L The notification dated 12.03.2015 issued by the Ministry of Overseas
Indian Affairs, Government of India has been challenged in this batch of petitions.
ORDER
2. The controversy essentially relates to a mechanism that has been put in place to safeguard the interest ofnurses recruited by employers overseas.
3. After some arguments, Mr IGrtiman Singh has made the following statement on instructions:- "All State run RAs and Private RAs shall be bound by the same Terms and Conditions for recruitment and emigration ofIndian Nurses. Both the State run and Private RAs will need to execute the same documents in this regard. The website will be suitably modified to reflect this position and any foreign employer choosing to make recruitments through either route will need to go through the same steps and procedure on the e-Migrate System."
4. The respondents are bound down to the aforesaid statement and it is further directed that the modification to the website will be carried out within a period ofsix weeks from today.
5. In view of the above, the learned counsel for the petitioners state that their grievance no longer survives and seek to withdraw the present petitions.
6. The petitions and all the pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
VIBHU BAKHRU, J AUGUST 10, 2017 RK