Ravinder Kumar v. Indo-Tibetan Border Police Force

Delhi High Court · 29 Jul 2025 · 2025:DHC:6234-DB
C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla
W.P.(C) 11061/2025
2025:DHC:6234-DB
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging deductions under the ITBP Force Act for non-impleadment of necessary parties, allowing refiling after proper party inclusion.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 11061/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 11061/2025, CM APPL. 45504/2025, CM APPL.
45505/2025 & CM APPL. 45506/2025 RAVINDER KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ajit Kakkar and Mr. Aman Kumar, Advs.
VERSUS
INDO-TIBETAN BORDER POLICE FORCE .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Balendu Shekhar, CGSC
WITH
Mr. Krishna Chaitanya, GP and DC
(JAG) Devender Singh, ITBP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL)
29.07.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
JUDGMENT

1. The prayer in this writ petition reads thus: “a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or such other Writ as may be expedient, directing the Respondent to stop the Deduction of and payment of Rs. 7,000/- (R.5,000/-+ Rs. 2,000/-) in the name of Ms. Hema Rani and Master Vinayak under SECTION 61 2 (i) OF THE ITBP FORCE ACT 1992; and,”

2. We note that, despite the aforesaid prayer, Hema Rani and Vinayak, to whom payments are being prayed to be discontinued, have not been made parties. We, accordingly, dismiss this writ petition for non-impleadment of necessary parties with liberty to the W.P.(C) 11061/2025 petitioner to reinstitute the petition after impleading necessary parties.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J JULY 29, 2025