Sajan v. Union of India and Ors.

Delhi High Court · 06 Aug 2025 · 2025:DHC:6311-DB
Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain
W.P.(C) 356/2020
2025:DHC:6311-DB
procedural other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed an application to correct the record by including the appearance of counsel for respondents in a prior judgment through a corrigendum.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 356/2020
SAJAN .....Petitioner
Through: Mr.Sachin Miglani and Ms.Sukriti Ghai, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr.Piyush Beriwal, Ms.Jyotsna Vyas, Ms.Ruchita Srivastava, Advs. for R-1 to 3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R 06.08.2025
CM APPL. 48056/2025
JUDGMENT

1. By this application, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.[1] to 3 states that his appearance has not been recorded in the Judgment dated 30.07.2025.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the respondent nos.[1] to 3/applicants, the application is allowed.

3. The appearance of Mr.Piyush Beriwal, Advocate, shall be duly reflected for the respondent nos.[1] to 3 in the Judgment dated 30.07.2025.

4. The application is disposed of.

5. This order shall be uploaded as a Corrigendum to the Judgment dated 30.07.2025.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J MADHU JAIN, J AUGUST 6, 2025/Arya/DG